167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9314987)
1. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions.
Mahfouz AE; Hamm B; Wolf KJ
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8259426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Korobkin M; Lombardi TJ; Aisen AM; Francis IR; Quint LE; Dunnick NR; Londy F; Shapiro B; Gross MD; Thompson NW
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):411-8. PubMed ID: 7480685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kuhl CK; Bieling H; Gieseke J; Ebel T; Mielcarek P; Far F; Folkers P; Elevelt A; Schild HH
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8988196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Half-Fourier, three-dimensional technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: initial characterization of breast lesions.
Perman WH; Heiberg EV; Herrmann VM
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):263-9. PubMed ID: 8657924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liver metastases: improved detection with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging?
Hamm B; Mahfouz AE; Taupitz M; Mitchell DG; Nelson R; Halpern E; Speidel A; Wolf KJ; Saini S
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 9051015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.
Hamm B; Thoeni RF; Gould RG; Bernardino ME; Lüning M; Saini S; Mahfouz AE; Taupitz M; Wolf KJ
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):417-23. PubMed ID: 8284392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser therapy for breast cancer: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation.
Mumtaz H; Hall-Craggs MA; Wotherspoon A; Paley M; Buonaccorsi G; Amin Z; Wilkinson I; Kissin MW; Davidson TI; Taylor I; Bown SG
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 8756910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal masses: MR imaging differentiation with rim-to-center differential enhancement ratios.
Ma LD; Frassica FJ; McCarthy EF; Bluemke DA; Zerhouni EA
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):739-44. PubMed ID: 9051028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in MRT in breast carcinoma].
Hess T; Knopp MV; Hoffmann U; Brix G; Junkermann H; Zuna I; von Fournier D; van Kaick G
Rofo; 1994 Jun; 160(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 8011997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations.
Kaiser WA; Zeitler E
Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):681-6. PubMed ID: 2916021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of breast cancer with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging combined with magnetization transfer contrast using a newly developed breast surface coil for the supine position.
Shimada M; Senoo A; Hayashi S; Moriya H; Nanba T; Kogure T; Nakayama H; Nakagome M; Ito K; Kaneko I; Tsubuku M
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 9192432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
