156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9315770)
1. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis.
Scheidler J; Hricak H; Yu KK; Subak L; Segal MR
JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(13):1096-101. PubMed ID: 9315770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of hematogenous bone metastasis in cervical cancer: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Liu FY; Yen TC; Chen MY; Lai CH; Chang TC; Chou HH; Hong JH; Chen YR; Ng KK
Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(23):5470-80. PubMed ID: 19739235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging.
de Bondt RB; Nelemans PJ; Hofman PA; Casselman JW; Kremer B; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 17391885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Kinkel K; Kaji Y; Yu KK; Segal MR; Lu Y; Powell CB; Hricak H
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 10478237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.
Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additional value of combined evaluation of tumor size with lymph node size in the detection of lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
Kang S; Kim YS; Choi HJ; Kim MH; Cho KS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 23863534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Lymph node metastasis of carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Role of lymphography and computerized tomography].
La Fianza A; Dore R; Di Giulio G; Alerci M; Di Maggio EM; Franchi M; Donadello N; Campani R
Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 2244037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer.
Rockall AG; Sohaib SA; Harisinghani MG; Babar SA; Singh N; Jeyarajah AR; Oram DH; Jacobs IJ; Shepherd JH; Reznek RH
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2813-21. PubMed ID: 15837995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S
Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Luo Q; Luo L; Tang L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533034617742311. PubMed ID: 29343205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis with comprehensive evaluation of MR images and clinical findings.
Kim MH; Kim JK; Lee Y; Park BW; Lee CK; Kim N; Cho G; Choi HJ; Cho KS
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1175-83. PubMed ID: 21969698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging in cervical cancer.
Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
