These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9315770)
1. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. Scheidler J; Hricak H; Yu KK; Subak L; Segal MR JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(13):1096-101. PubMed ID: 9315770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of hematogenous bone metastasis in cervical cancer: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Liu FY; Yen TC; Chen MY; Lai CH; Chang TC; Chou HH; Hong JH; Chen YR; Ng KK Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(23):5470-80. PubMed ID: 19739235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. de Bondt RB; Nelemans PJ; Hofman PA; Casselman JW; Kremer B; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 17391885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Kinkel K; Kaji Y; Yu KK; Segal MR; Lu Y; Powell CB; Hricak H Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 10478237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis. Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additional value of combined evaluation of tumor size with lymph node size in the detection of lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer patients. Kang S; Kim YS; Choi HJ; Kim MH; Cho KS J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 23863534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Lymph node metastasis of carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Role of lymphography and computerized tomography]. La Fianza A; Dore R; Di Giulio G; Alerci M; Di Maggio EM; Franchi M; Donadello N; Campani R Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 2244037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. Rockall AG; Sohaib SA; Harisinghani MG; Babar SA; Singh N; Jeyarajah AR; Oram DH; Jacobs IJ; Shepherd JH; Reznek RH J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2813-21. PubMed ID: 15837995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer. Mezrich R Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis with comprehensive evaluation of MR images and clinical findings. Kim MH; Kim JK; Lee Y; Park BW; Lee CK; Kim N; Cho G; Choi HJ; Cho KS Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1175-83. PubMed ID: 21969698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging. Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging in cervical cancer. Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Selman TJ; Mann C; Zamora J; Appleyard TL; Khan K CMAJ; 2008 Mar; 178(7):855-62. PubMed ID: 18362381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic implication of retrocrural lymph node involvement revealed by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer. Im HJ; Yoon HJ; Lee ES; Kim TS; Kim JY; Chung JK; Kim SK; Park SY Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Mar; 35(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 24253568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]