302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9316258)
1. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Graff RB; Gibson L
Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of constant versus varied reinforcers on preference and resistance to change.
Milo JS; Mace FC; Nevin JA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 21119852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
Francisco MT; Borrero JC; Sy JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.
Egel AL
J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7298543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistence of stereotypic behavior: examining the effects of external reinforcers.
Ahearn WH; Clark KM; Gardenier NC; Chung BI; Dube WV
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 14768664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 9316260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing preference for social interactions.
Clay CJ; Samaha AL; Bloom SE; Bogoev BK; Boyle MA
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):362-71. PubMed ID: 23009945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.
Dyer K; Dunlap G; Winterling V
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 2074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A variation of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of aberrant behavior.
Britton LN; Carr JE; Kellum KK; Dozier CL; Weil TM
Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(6):425-35. PubMed ID: 11153827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children.
Charlop MH; Kurtz PF; Casey FG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 2373653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
