247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9316260)
1. Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 9316260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple-stimulus preference assessments.
Bojak SL; Carr JE
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):515-8. PubMed ID: 10641304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Graff RB; Gibson L
Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.
DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Goh HL; Worsdell AS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 9378681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.
Shore BA; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Smith RG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 9103985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Piazza CC; Adelinis JD; Hanley GP; Goh HL; Delia MD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 10738949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Lindberg JS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):419-35. PubMed ID: 10641298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods.
Windsor J; Piché LM; Locke PA
Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(6):439-55. PubMed ID: 7871232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Berg WK; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Stricker J; Vinquist K; Salil Kumar Dutt A; Dolezal D; Luke J; Kemmerer L; Mews J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
Lalli JS; Kates K
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.
Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Lindberg JS; Conners J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 12723866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
