These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9316260)

  • 21. Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.
    North ST; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 16270842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of increased response effort on self-injury and object manipulation as competing responses.
    Zhou L; Goff GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 10738950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.
    Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Jann KE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 25891170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism: A replication in Italy.
    Slanzi CM; Graziano M; D'Angelo G; Vollmer TR; Conine DE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31835275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.
    DeLeon IG; Fisher WW; Rodriguez-Catter V; Maglieri K; Herman K; Marhefka JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):463-73. PubMed ID: 11800185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Magnitude on the Displacement of Leisure Items by Edible Items During Preference Assessments.
    Clark SB; Call NA; Simmons CA; Scheithauer MC; Muething CS; Parks N
    Behav Modif; 2020 Sep; 44(5):727-745. PubMed ID: 30983381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.
    Russell D; Ingvarsson ET; Haggar JL; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 29193060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Thompson RH; Lindberg JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):59-76. PubMed ID: 12723867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences.
    Zhou L; Iwata BA; Goff GA; Shore BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 11421310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcement as treatments for food selectivity.
    Kern L; Marder TJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 8682740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP; Hilker K; Derby KM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 8682733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.
    Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Worsdell AS; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12723863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of noncontingent access to food on the rate of object mouthing across three settings.
    Roane HS; Kelly ML; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):579-82. PubMed ID: 14768675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
    Francisco MT; Borrero JC; Sy JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism.
    Conine DE; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):557-573. PubMed ID: 30468244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.
    Smith RG; Iwata BA; Shore BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 7706151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.
    de Vries C; Yu CT; Sakko G; Wirth KM; Walters KL; Marion C; Martin GL
    Am J Ment Retard; 2005 Mar; 110(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15762824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restricted Interests and Autism: Further Assessment of Preferences for a Variety of Leisure Items.
    Spear MA; Karsten A; White EA
    Behav Modif; 2018 Jan; 42(1):108-125. PubMed ID: 28073293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.