These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9316265)

  • 1. Development of Weiner et al. force field parameters suitable for conformational studies of [1,4]-benzodiazepines and related compounds.
    Moyna G; Hernandez G; Williams HJ; Nachman RJ; Scott AI
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1997; 37(5):951-6. PubMed ID: 9316265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field.
    Meagher KL; Redman LT; Carlson HA
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Jul; 24(9):1016-25. PubMed ID: 12759902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.
    Jakalian A; Jack DB; Bayly CI
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Dec; 23(16):1623-41. PubMed ID: 12395429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An extensible and systematic force field, ESFF, for molecular modeling of organic, inorganic, and organometallic systems.
    Shi S; Yan L; Yang Y; Fisher-Shaulsky J; Thacher T
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Jul; 24(9):1059-76. PubMed ID: 12759906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are current semiempirical methods better than force fields? A study from the thermodynamics perspective.
    Seabra Gde M; Walker RC; Roitberg AE
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Oct; 113(43):11938-48. PubMed ID: 19848431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular dynamic simulations of environment and sequence dependent DNA conformations: the development of the BMS nucleic acid force field and comparison with experimental results.
    Langley DR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 1998 Dec; 16(3):487-509. PubMed ID: 10052609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.
    Mobley DL; Dumont E; Chodera JD; Dill KA
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar; 111(9):2242-54. PubMed ID: 17291029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular mechanics studies on the conformations of 2',3'-dideoxy-2',3'-didehydroguanine nucleoside, D4G.
    Rao SN
    Biophys J; 1998 Jun; 74(6):3131-9. PubMed ID: 9635766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the force field parameters for phosphoimidazole and phosphohistidine.
    Kosinsky YA; Volynsky PE; Lagant P; Vergoten G; Suzuki E; Arseniev AS; Efremov RG
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1313-21. PubMed ID: 15185324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New AMBER force field parameters of heme iron for cytochrome P450s determined by quantum chemical calculations of simplified models.
    Oda A; Yamaotsu N; Hirono S
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Jun; 26(8):818-26. PubMed ID: 15812779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of atomic charges and orbital energies as hydrogen-bonding-donor parameters for QSAR studies: comparison of MNDO, AM1 and PM3 methods.
    Ghafourian T; Dearden JC
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2000 Jun; 52(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 10875535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A molecular mechanics force field for lignin.
    Petridis L; Smith JC
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Feb; 30(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 18677707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of computational chemistry methods: crystallographic and cheminformatics analysis of aminothiazole methoximes.
    Ercanli T; Boyd DB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):591-601. PubMed ID: 15921449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conformational analysis of the major DNA adduct derived from the food mutagen 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline.
    Wu X; Shapiro R; Broyde S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 1999 Oct; 12(10):895-905. PubMed ID: 10525264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A molecular mechanics force field for biologically important sterols.
    Cournia Z; Smith JC; Ullmann GM
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Oct; 26(13):1383-99. PubMed ID: 16028234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RM1: a reparameterization of AM1 for H, C, N, O, P, S, F, Cl, Br, and I.
    Rocha GB; Freire RO; Simas AM; Stewart JJ
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Jul; 27(10):1101-11. PubMed ID: 16691568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular modeling studies of 20-(S)-camptothecin analogs as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I and anticancer/antitumor agents.
    Carrigan SW; Fox PC; Wall ME; Wani MC; Bowen JP
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1997 Jan; 11(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 9139114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of Linear Scaling Semiempirical LocalSCF Method.
    Anisimov VM; Bugaenko VL; Bobrikov VV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2006 Nov; 2(6):1685-92. PubMed ID: 26627039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular dynamics simulations of the chromophore binding site of Deinococcus radiodurans bacteriophytochrome using new force field parameters for the phytochromobilin chromophore.
    Kaminski S; Daminelli G; Mroginski MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jan; 113(4):945-58. PubMed ID: 19123828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) study using semiempirical, density functional, ab initio methods and pharmacophore derivation using DISCOtech on sigma 1 ligands.
    Jung D; Floyd J; Gund TM
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1385-99. PubMed ID: 15185333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.