These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 931758)

  • 1. Internal circuit noise of hearing aids and speech intelligibility.
    Sung RJ; Sung GS; Angelelli RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):239-42. PubMed ID: 931758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplified earmuffs: impact on speech intelligibility in industrial noise for listeners with hearing loss.
    Dolan TG; O'Loughlin D
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16180971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of steady state gain reduction produced by amplitude modulation based noise reduction in digital hearing aids.
    Hoetink AE; Körössy L; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):444-55. PubMed ID: 19925331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant recognition and quality judgments of noise-reduction hearing aids.
    Tyler RS; Kuk FK
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():224-9. PubMed ID: 2356731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Nose and speech discrimination with specific hearing aid systems (author's transl)].
    Bernath O; Richartz W; Bormann B
    HNO; 1978 Feb; 26(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 632137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perception of internal circuit noise in hearing aids by listeners with normal hearing.
    Agnew J; Block M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1177-91. PubMed ID: 9328888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.