These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9322779)
1. Reproductive medicine and the social state of childlessness. Jansen RP Med J Aust; 1997 Sep; 167(6):321-3. PubMed ID: 9322779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Gatekeeping and assisted reproductive technology. The ethical rights and responsibilities of doctors. Pearn JH Med J Aust; 1997 Sep; 167(6):318-20. PubMed ID: 9322778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Private religious hospitals: limitations upon autonomous moral choices in reproductive medicine. Bassett WW J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):455-583. PubMed ID: 11475568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics' opinions on confidential care for sexually active minors and physicians' exercise of conscience in refusal of services. Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 23116952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The scope and limits of conscientious objection. Dickens BM; Cook RJ Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Oct; 71(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 11044548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A physician's ethical and legal obligations to treat HIV-infected patients. The MMA Committee on Ethics and Medical-Legal Affairs. Minn Med; 1992 Jun; 75(6):27-31. PubMed ID: 1495458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A right to health care?: A comparative perspective. Giesen D Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(2):277-95. PubMed ID: 10142772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. May doctors refuse infertility treatments to gay patients? Appel JM Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 16898357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Refusal of invasive obstetrical intervention and the patient's right law]. Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9332060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. First amendment -- California Supreme Court holds that free exercise of religion does not give fertility doctors right to deny treatment to lesbians. -- North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. San Diego County Superior Court, 189 P.3d 959 (Cal. 2008). Harv Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 122(2):787-94. PubMed ID: 19130682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Childlessness in Cameroon: artificially assisted fertility or the customary law solution. Ngwafor EN Med Law; 1994; 13(3-4):297-306. PubMed ID: 7968305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stand up to homophobia. Payne D Nurs Stand; 2009 Feb 4-10; 23(22):1. PubMed ID: 19263954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial reproductive technologies in Australia--legislation for the new millennium? Terry V; Shorey CD Med Law; 2000; 19(2):209-35. PubMed ID: 10994211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Significance of reproductive medicine in regard to judicial and ethical concerns in Germany]. Beyer DA; Amari F; Diedrich K; Griesinger G Ther Umsch; 2009 Dec; 66(12):819-23. PubMed ID: 19950061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conscientious objection and the nurse: a right or a privilege? McHale JV Br J Nurs; 2009 Nov 12-25; 18(20):1262-3. PubMed ID: 20081664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human rights. Indefinite articles. Outhwaite W Health Serv J; 1999 May; 109(5656):suppl 9-11. PubMed ID: 10537887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conflict in the pediatric setting: clinical judgment vs. parental autonomy. Goldworth A Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(1):36-41; discussion 41-3. PubMed ID: 7627364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]