These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9323500)

  • 1. Women's reproductive choices: the impact of Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 9323500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation.
    Lichter DT; McLaughlin DK; Ribar DC
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):281-7. PubMed ID: 9859019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
    Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.
    Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary investigation of the effects of restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortions on female STD rates.
    Sen B
    Health Econ; 2003 Jun; 12(6):453-64. PubMed ID: 12759915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates.
    Matthews S; Ribar D; Wilhelm M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(2):52-60. PubMed ID: 9099567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State actions on reproductive health issues in 1994.
    Sollom T
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7796902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
    Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion services in rural Washington State, 1983-1984 to 1993-1994: availability and outcomes.
    Dobie SA; Hart LG; Glusker A; Madigan D; Larson EH; Rosenblatt RA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 10723649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How are restrictive abortion statutes associated with unintended teen birth?
    Coles MS; Makino KK; Stanwood NL; Dozier A; Klein JD
    J Adolesc Health; 2010 Aug; 47(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 20638008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births.
    Lindrooth RC; McCullough JS
    Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 17403463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of medicaid family planning waivers and Title X in enhancing access to preconception care.
    Gold RB; Alrich C
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(6 Suppl):S47-51. PubMed ID: 19059549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1992.
    Daley D; Gold RB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(6):244-51. PubMed ID: 8313948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal restrictions and complications of abortion: insights from data on complication rates in the United States.
    Rolnick JA; Vorhies JS
    J Public Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 33(3):348-62. PubMed ID: 22622483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.
    Fried MG
    Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
    Benshoof J
    Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Providing controversial health care: abortion services since 1973.
    Forrest JD; Henshaw SK
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 8274870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sounding Board. Abortions in America: the effects of restrictive funding.
    Berger LR
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Jun; 298(26):1474-7. PubMed ID: 349392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mystery caller evaluation of Medicaid staff responses about state coverage of abortion care.
    Dennis A; Blanchard K
    Womens Health Issues; 2012 Mar; 22(2):e143-8. PubMed ID: 22154890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.