79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9324538)
1. [Optimizing the distribution and test locations in statistical perimetry. Preliminary results].
Sugimoto K; Zulauf M; Schötzau A; Rentsch R
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 May; 210(5):302-4. PubMed ID: 9324538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing distribution and number of test locations in perimetry.
Sugimoto K; Schötzau A; Bergamin O; Zulauf M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Feb; 236(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 9498120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detectability of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Octopus automatic perimeter. A comparison between program G-1 and programs 31 and 32 and their combinations].
Gloor B; Gloor E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Jan; 188(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3754292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma].
Gramer E; Roesen B; Siebert M
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter].
Gramer E; Althaus G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measuring the optic papilla with planimetry and the optic nerve head analyzer in glaucoma and suspected glaucoma. II. Correlations of the results of both methods with changes in the visual field, studied with the Octopus automatic perimeter].
Stürmer J; Schaer-Stoller F; Gloor B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Mar; 196(3):132-42. PubMed ID: 2342313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Kawa P; Jurkowska J; Zarnowski T; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
Zulauf M; Caprioli J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the oculo-kinetic perimetry glaucoma screening test in a sub-Saharan African setting.
Mahmoud AO; Omalase CO; Ekundayo K
West Afr J Med; 2008 Jul; 27(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 19256315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Flicker perimetry (CFF) in glaucoma diagnosis].
Dudziński A; Zawojska I; Kinasz R
Klin Oczna; 2003; 105(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 14746180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
