These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9324757)

  • 1. From science fiction to ethics quandary.
    Vogel G
    Science; 1997 Sep; 277(5333):1753-4. PubMed ID: 9324757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene-splice oversight.
    Parens E
    Washington Post; 1996 Jun; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict at the RAC.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Apr; 298(4952):159. PubMed ID: 11653881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panel that reviews gene tests in humans has no applications.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should dying patients receive untested genetic methods?
    Thompson L
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5094):452. PubMed ID: 8424165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panel approves gene trial for "normals".
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5306):1561. PubMed ID: 9072819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public oversight is necessary if human gene therapy is to progress.
    Zallen DT
    Hum Gene Ther; 1996 May; 7(7):795-7. PubMed ID: 8860831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Varmus orders up a review of the science of gene therapy.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1995 Mar; 267(5204):1588. PubMed ID: 7886441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene enhancements' thorny ethical traits.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1997 Oct; ():A1, A18-19. PubMed ID: 11647258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human gene therapy: application, ethics and regulation.
    Baskerville G
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1992; 96(4):733-63. PubMed ID: 11652212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
    Kass LR
    New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of mercy.
    Crigger BJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(3):3. PubMed ID: 11643129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of the Recombinant Advisory Committee.
    Johnson IS
    Science; 1984 Apr; 224(4646):243. PubMed ID: 6710142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Put human cloning on hold, say bioethicists.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 9207322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH asked to tighten gene therapy rules.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1986 Sep; 233(4771):1378-9. PubMed ID: 3462907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US plan to scrap DNA panel splits genetic researchers.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6588):197. PubMed ID: 8717029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New rules for gene-therapy pioneers.
    New Sci; 1984 Jan; 101(1392):7. PubMed ID: 11655580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-critical federal science? The ethics experiment within the U.S. Human Genome Project.
    Juengst ET
    Soc Philos Policy; 1996; 13(2):63-95. PubMed ID: 11653300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical and policy issues of human cloning.
    Shapiro HT
    Science; 1997 Jul; 277(5323):195-6. PubMed ID: 9235635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Varmus proposes to scrap the RAC.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1996 May; 272(5264):945. PubMed ID: 8638134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.