239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9326900)
1. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: psychometric evaluation and patient preference.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1997 Oct; 76(10):1675-83. PubMed ID: 9326900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
Heydecke G; Boudrias P; Awad MA; De Albuquerque RF; Lund JP; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 12562375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: psychometric evaluation.
de Grandmont P; Feine JS; Taché R; Boudrias P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1096-104. PubMed ID: 8006237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis.
Feine JS; de Grandmont P; Boudrias P; Brien N; LaMarche C; Taché R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1105-11. PubMed ID: 8006238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes.
de Albuquerque Júnior RF; Lund JP; Tang L; Larivée J; de Grandmont P; Gauthier G; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Dec; 11(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 11168249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
Elsyad MA; Hegazy SA; Hammouda NI; Al-Tonbary GY; Habib AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Feine JS; Maskawi K; de Grandmont P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1646-56. PubMed ID: 7929979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
Ascher A; Carlsson GE; Kronström M
Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 25771650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
