97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9327475)
1. Integrating pros and cons for mammography and Pap testing: extending the construct of decisional balance to two behaviors.
Rakowski W; Clark MA; Pearlman DN; Ehrich B; Rimer BK; Goldstein MG; Dube CE; Woolverton H
Prev Med; 1997; 26(5 Pt 1):664-73. PubMed ID: 9327475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why do women's attitudes toward mammography change over time? Implications for physician-patient communication.
Pearlman DN; Rakowski W; Clark MA; Ehrich B; Rimer BK; Goldstein MG; Woolverton H; Dube CE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Jun; 6(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 9184780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening.
Park S; Chang S; Chung C
Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 16150010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women.
Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 15831418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of behavioral stage in pap testing by using transtheoretical model].
Lee HJ; Lee SH; Jung SH; Shin HR; Oh DK
J Prev Med Public Health; 2005 Feb; 38(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 16312913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HPV testing versus repeat Pap testing for the management of a minor abnormal Pap smear: evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice.
McCaffery KJ; Irwig L; Chan SF; Macaskill P; Barratt A; Lewicka M; Clarke J; Weisberg E
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):473-9, 481. PubMed ID: 18757164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychological, behavioral, and interpersonal impact of human papillomavirus and Pap test results.
Kahn JA; Slap GB; Bernstein DI; Kollar LM; Tissot AM; Hillard PA; Rosenthal SL
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Sep; 14(7):650-9. PubMed ID: 16181021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between decisional balance and stage of adopting mammography and Pap testing among Chinese American women.
Strong C; Liang W
Cancer Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 19900848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys.
Rakowski W; Clark MA; Ehrich B
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):487-95. PubMed ID: 10600429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention.
Rakowski W; Ehrich B; Goldstein MG; Rimer BK; Pearlman DN; Clark MA; Velicer WF; Woolverton H
Prev Med; 1998; 27(5 Pt 1):748-56. PubMed ID: 9808807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of sexual abstinence behaviour in Taiwanese adolescents: a longitudinal application of the transtheoretical model.
Wang RH; Cheng CP; Chou FH
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1010-7. PubMed ID: 19077025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's compliance with public health guidelines for mammograms and pap tests in Canada and the United States: an analysis of data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey Of Health.
Blackwell DL; Martinez ME; Gentleman JF
Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 18182305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the Champion's Health Belief Model Scale among Lithuanian women.
Zelviene A; Bogusevicius A
Cancer Nurs; 2007; 30(3):E20-8. PubMed ID: 17510578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
Halabi S; Skinner CS; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Crawford YS; Rimer BK
J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.
Reeves MJ; Remington PL
Prev Med; 1999 Sep; 29(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 10479608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography.
Rakowski W; Andersen MR; Stoddard AM; Urban N; Rimer BK; Lane DS; Fox SA; Costanza ME
Health Psychol; 1997 Sep; 16(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 9302540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Context of barriers to Pap testing in Korean women.
Park S; Chang S; Chung C
Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Nov; 19(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 17098154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup.
Zambrana RE; Breen N; Fox SA; Gutierrez-Mohamed ML
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):466-77. PubMed ID: 10600427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What predicts a Cypriot woman's decision to obtain or not obtain a screening mammogram? Implications for the promotion of screening mammography in Cyprus.
Tolma EL; Reininger BM; Ureda J
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Apr; 15(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16523012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
