BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9327795)

  • 1. Costs and benefits of routine follow-up after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.
    Agboola OO; Grunfeld E; Coyle D; Perry GA
    CMAJ; 1997 Oct; 157(7):879-86. PubMed ID: 9327795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of routine vaginal cytology for endometrial cancer surveillance.
    Bristow RE; Purinton SC; Santillan A; Diaz-Montes TP; Gardner GJ; Giuntoli RL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):709-13. PubMed ID: 16797686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
    Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pattern of failure and value of follow-up procedures in endometrial and cervical cancer patients.
    Sartori E; Pasinetti B; Carrara L; Gambino A; Odicino F; Pecorelli S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S241-7. PubMed ID: 17826824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer?
    Cooper AL; Dornfeld-Finke JM; Banks HW; Davey DD; Modesitt SC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 16394042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Periodic follow-up after breast cancer and the effect on survival.
    te Boekhorst DS; Peer NG; van der Sluis RF; Wobbes T; Ruers TJ
    Eur J Surg; 2001 Jul; 167(7):490-6. PubMed ID: 11560382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is routine follow-up after endometrial cancer justified?
    Cohen MM
    CMAJ; 1997 Oct; 157(7):899-900. PubMed ID: 9327797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Routine endometrial sampling of asymptomatic premenopausal women shedding normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou tests is not cost effective.
    Kapali M; Agaram NP; Dabbs D; Kanbour A; White S; Austin RM
    Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 17262796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of routine follow-up of patients treated for endometrial carcinoma.
    Shumsky AG; Stuart GC; Brasher PM; Nation JG; Robertson DI; Sangkarat S
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 7959289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of routine follow-up in patients treated for carcinoma of the vulva.
    Oonk MH; de Hullu JA; Hollema H; Mourits MJ; Pras E; Wymenga AN; van der Zee AG
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(12):2624-9. PubMed ID: 14669281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surveillance for recurrent endometrial carcinoma: development of a follow-up scheme.
    Reddoch JM; Burke TW; Morris M; Tornos C; Levenback C; Gershenson DM
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 7590477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Small but significant survival benefit in patients who undergo routine follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Bonthuis DC; Landheer ML; Spillenaar Bilgen EJ; Slootmans FC; van Lier H; Klinkenbijl JH; Wobbes T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15522556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Follow-up cost of breast cancer patients with localized disease after primary treatment: a randomized trial.
    Kokko R; Hakama M; Holli K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Oct; 93(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 16132530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer--is routine follow-up after gastrectomy worthwhile?
    Böhner H; Zimmer T; Hopfenmüller W; Berger G; Buhr HJ
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(35):1489-94. PubMed ID: 11100384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis? An Italian multicenter retrospective analysis.
    Zola P; Fuso L; Mazzola S; Piovano E; Perotto S; Gadducci A; Galletto L; Landoni F; Maggino T; Raspagliesi F; Sartori E; Scambia G
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S150-4. PubMed ID: 17868785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of routine follow-up of patients treated for T1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinomas of the floor of mouth and tongue.
    Merkx MA; van Gulick JJ; Marres HA; Kaanders JH; Bruaset I; Verbeek A; de Wilde PC
    Head Neck; 2006 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16155911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy, impact on survival and cost of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer aim].
    Cola B; Cuicchi D; Lecce F; Lombardi R; Ciaroni V; Dalla Via B
    Ann Ital Chir; 2008; 79(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18572732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer.
    Titu LV; Nicholson AA; Hartley JE; Breen DJ; Monson JR
    Ann Surg; 2006 Mar; 243(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 16495699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care.
    Grunfeld E; Levine MN; Julian JA; Coyle D; Szechtman B; Mirsky D; Verma S; Dent S; Sawka C; Pritchard KI; Ginsburg D; Wood M; Whelan T
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 24(6):848-55. PubMed ID: 16418496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective study.
    van Wijk FH; Huikeshoven FJ; Abdulkadir L; Ewing PC; Burger CW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jan; 130(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 16460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.