BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9328191)

  • 1. The cervical cancer screening program in Mexico: problems with access and coverage.
    Lazcano-Ponce EC; Nájera-Aguilar P; Buiatti E; Alonso-de-Ruiz P; Kuri P; Cantoral L; Hernández-Avila M
    Cancer Causes Control; 1997 Sep; 8(5):698-704. PubMed ID: 9328191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The positive experience of screening quality among users of a cervical cancer detection center.
    Lazcano-Ponce EC; Moss S; Cruz-Valdez A; de Ruíz PA; Martínez-León CJ; Casares-Queralt S; Hernández-Avila M
    Arch Med Res; 2002; 33(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11886720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the cervical cancer screening programme in Mexico: a population-based case-control study.
    Hernández-Avila M; Lazcano-Ponce EC; de Ruíz PA; Romieu I
    Int J Epidemiol; 1998 Jun; 27(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 9698122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The factors that determine participation in cervical cancer screening in the state of Morelos].
    Lazcano-Ponce EC; Moss S; Cruz-Valdez A; Alonso de Ruiz P; Casares-Queralt S; Martínez-León CJ; Hernández-Avila M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1999; 41(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 10624139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).
    Borràs JM; Guillen M; Sánchez V; Juncà S; Vicente R
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 10548398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cervical cancer screening: knowledge of Pap smear benefits and utilization in Mexico].
    Aguilar-Perez JA; Leyva-López AG; Angulo-Nájera D; Salinas A; Lazcano-Ponce EC
    Rev Saude Publica; 2003 Feb; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 12488926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
    Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
    Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Barriers to early detection of cervical-uterine cancer in Mexico.
    Lazcano-Ponce EC; Castro R; Allen B; Nájera P; Alonso de Ruíz PA; Hernández-Avila M
    J Womens Health; 1999 Apr; 8(3):399-408. PubMed ID: 10326994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with Mexican women's familiarity with the purpose of the Pap test.
    Nájera Aguilar P; Lazcano Ponce EC; de Ruíz PA; Ramírez Sánchez T; Cantoral Uriza L; Hernández Avila M
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 9041746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social disparities in access to breast and cervical cancer screening by women living in Spain.
    Ricardo-Rodrigues I; Jiménez-García R; Hernández-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Jiménez-Trujillo I; López de Andrés A
    Public Health; 2015 Jul; 129(7):881-8. PubMed ID: 25818014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cervical cancer screening coverage and associated factors in a city in southern Brazil: a population-based study].
    Gasperin SI; Boing AF; Kupek E
    Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Jul; 27(7):1312-22. PubMed ID: 21808816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of Pap smear screening in socioeconomically disadvantaged elderly women.
    Weinrich S; Coker AL; Weinrich M; Eleazer GP; Greene FL
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1995 Mar; 43(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 7884116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accessibility to healthcare services in the recent cervical cytology performed in an urban area in Colombia].
    Iván Lucumí Cuesta D; Gómez Gutiérrez LF
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2004; 78(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 15293957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Jordan among Women from Different Socioeconomic Strata: Analysis of the 2012 Population-Based Household Survey.
    Al Rifai R; Nakamura K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6697-704. PubMed ID: 26434897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socioeconomic status and cancer screening.
    Segnan N
    IARC Sci Publ; 1997; (138):369-76. PubMed ID: 9353678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasons for variation in coverage in the NHS cervical screening programme.
    McGahan CE; Blanks RG; Moss SM
    Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):354-66. PubMed ID: 11843937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Mexico.
    Watkins MM; Gabali C; Winkleby M; Gaona E; Lebaron S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2002; 12(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 12366665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
    Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.