These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9328520)

  • 1. Assessing dangerousness: protecting the interests of patients.
    Bingley W
    Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 1997; (32):28-9. PubMed ID: 9328520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False prediction of future dangerousness: error rates and psychopathy checklist--revised.
    Freedman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 11302393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How psychiatrists and judges assess the dangerousness of persons with mental illness: an 'expertise bias".
    Poletiek FH
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(1-2):19-29. PubMed ID: 11979489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dangerousness and risk assessment: the state of the art.
    Bauer A; Rosca P; Khawalled R; Gruzniewski A; Grinshpoon A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2003; 40(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 14619677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From dangerousness to risk assessment of community violence: taking stock at the turn of the century.
    Steadman HJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 11055522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: dangerousness--a failed paradigm for clinical practice and service delivery.
    Norko MA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 11055524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Forensic psychiatric risk assessment is ethically defensible. The dangerousness and risk of relapse are possible to judge with more precision than random assessment].
    Grann M; Nilstun T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(18):2126-8. PubMed ID: 11006731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental health series. Predicting dangerousness.
    Regan J; Alderson A
    Tenn Med; 2002 May; 95(5):195-6. PubMed ID: 12012852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Prognosis of dangerousness in adolescent psychiatry expert assessment].
    Hirschberg W
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1998; 47(5):314-30. PubMed ID: 9654982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.
    Odeh MS; Zeiss RA; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16557618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Instruments for the assessment of violent behavior towards others among the mentally ill population].
    Bauer A; Birger M; Melamed Y
    Harefuah; 2009 Jan; 148(1):50-4, 87, 86. PubMed ID: 19320391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duty to third parties, dangerousness, and the right to refuse treatment: problematic concepts for psychiatrist and lawyer.
    Griffith EJ; Griffith EE
    Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(2):241-74. PubMed ID: 11664963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Assessment and management of the risk for violence. An overview of the literature].
    Tholen AJ
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 19536973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary: assessing the risk of violence--are "accurate" predictions useful?
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 11055523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Issues in violent risk assessment: lessons learned and future directions.
    Kroner DG
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Feb; 20(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 15601797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts.
    Large MM; Ryan CJ; Nielssen OB; Hayes RA
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Dec; 34(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 19043114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme.
    Webster CD; Nicholls TL; Martin ML; Desmarais SL; Brink J
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):747-66. PubMed ID: 17171764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation.
    Mullen PE; Mackenzie R; Ogloff JR; Pathé M; McEwan T; Purcell R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 17185471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are the mentally ill dangerous?
    Binder RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 10400428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.