These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9328885)

  • 1. Multisensory speech perception of young children with profound hearing loss.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Haras N; Bergman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1135-50. PubMed ID: 9328885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
    Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech teaching for deaf children in the age of bilingual/bicultural programs: the role of tactile aids.
    Plant G; Horan M; Reed H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():19-23. PubMed ID: 9428039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual spoken word recognition as a clinical criterion for sensory aids efficiency in Persian-language children with hearing loss.
    Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Vahab M; Bazrafkan M; Haghjoo A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2424-7. PubMed ID: 26607564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT; Berry SW; Myres WA; Kessler KS; Pope ML
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():105-15. PubMed ID: 2069171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A longitudinal evaluation of the speech perception capabilities of children using multichannel tactile vocoders.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK; Friedman KE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):518-33. PubMed ID: 8783131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception of children with cochlear implants and children with traditional hearing aids.
    Mildner V; Sindija B; Zrinski KV
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16428240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two training strategies for speech recognition with an electrotactile speech processor.
    Alcantara JI; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2138238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closed-Set Speech Discrimination Tests for Assessing Young Children.
    Vickers DA; Moore BCJ; Majeed A; Stephenson N; Alferaih H; Baer T; Marriage JE
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29189292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J; Core C; Larsen MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech feature recognition by profoundly hearing impaired children using a multiple-channel electrotactile speech processor and aided residual hearing.
    Alcántara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1260-73. PubMed ID: 2146295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hear here: children with hearing loss learn words by listening.
    Lew J; Purcell AA; Doble M; Lim LH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1716-25. PubMed ID: 25139133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of visual and tactile modalities.
    Summers IR; Du J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():29-33. PubMed ID: 9428041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.