247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9328890)
1. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor.
Fishman KE; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1201-15. PubMed ID: 9328890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10466568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1664-74. PubMed ID: 12398471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.
Donaldson GS; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of electrode location on speech recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Sep; 11(8):418-28. PubMed ID: 11012237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Cruz RJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):169-84. PubMed ID: 15724088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
Zwolan TA; Collins LM; Wakefield GH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3673-85. PubMed ID: 9407659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
Donaldson GS; Allen SL
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels.
Dorman MF; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 9562538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
Baskent D; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
