These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9328895)

  • 41. Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Konopka W; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1522-6. PubMed ID: 26199137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Otoacoustic emissions and extended high-frequency hearing sensitivity in young adults.
    Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jan; 44(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15796099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. VI. Findings in cochlear hearing impairment.
    Johnsen NJ; Parbo J; Elberling C
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 8322002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Correlation between speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Rana B; Barman A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Sep; 125(9):911-6. PubMed ID: 21729428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Pratt H; Shi Y; Polyakov A
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9472734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Frequency-specific information from click evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Avan P; Ravazzani P; Bonfils P
    Audiology; 1999; 38(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 10548370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Otoacoustic emissions measured with a physically open recording system.
    Withnell RH; Kirk DL; Yates GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):350-5. PubMed ID: 9670528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Plinkert PK; Bootz F; Vossieck T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1994; 251(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8024768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Searching for the optimal stimulus eliciting auditory brainstem responses in humans.
    Fobel O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2213-22. PubMed ID: 15532653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Otoacoustic emission estimates of human basilar membrane impulse response duration and cochlear filter tuning.
    Raufer S; Verhulst S
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():150-160. PubMed ID: 27989947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Bennett CL; Özdamar Ö
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1833-44. PubMed ID: 20968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Veuillet E; Duverdy-Bertholon F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 93(1-2):128-35. PubMed ID: 8735074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transducer hysteresis contributes to "stimulus artifact" in the measurement of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (L).
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME; Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):620-2. PubMed ID: 16158619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions analyzed in a time-frequency domain.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Blinowska KJ; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3720-9. PubMed ID: 19206799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Time-frequency distribution methods for the analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Sep; 6(2-3):159-75. PubMed ID: 9839862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reliable identification of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions using signal-processing techniques.
    Lutman ME
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8220275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3562-75. PubMed ID: 18247764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns: effects of time-windowing.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
    Audiology; 1999; 38(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 10437683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.