These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9329411)

  • 1. Disruption of barrier function in neonatal skin associated with adhesive removal.
    Lund CH; Nonato LB; Kuller JM; Franck LS; Cullander C; Durand DJ
    J Pediatr; 1997 Sep; 131(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 9329411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive tape vs pectin-based barrier use in preterm infants.
    Dollison EJ; Beckstrand J
    Neonatal Netw; 1995 Jun; 14(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 7783715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a pectin barrier for medical adhesive skin injury (epidermal stripping) in a premature infant.
    Oʼneil A; Schumacher B
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(3):219-21. PubMed ID: 24805172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring epidermal effects of ostomy skin barriers.
    Grove G; Houser T; Sibbald G; Salvadalena G
    Skin Res Technol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30387538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesives for medical application - Peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response.
    Mbithi F; Worsley PR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106168. PubMed ID: 37847959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a pectin-based barrier under tape to protect neonatal skin.
    Lund C; Kuller JM; Tobin C; Lefrak L; Franck LS
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1986; 15(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 3632999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects.
    Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function.
    Dykes PJ
    J Wound Care; 2007 Mar; 16(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 17385583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semipermeable polyurethane membrane as an artificial skin for the premature neonate.
    Knauth A; Gordin M; McNelis W; Baumgart S
    Pediatrics; 1989 Jun; 83(6):945-50. PubMed ID: 2726350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of kangaroo mother care vs expressed breast milk administration on pain associated with removal of adhesive tape in very low birth weight neonates: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nanavati RN; Balan R; Kabra NS
    Indian Pediatr; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1011-5. PubMed ID: 23798626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Barrier properties of the newborn infant's skin.
    Harpin VA; Rutter N
    J Pediatr; 1983 Mar; 102(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 6827416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP; Butcher M
    J Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 20(9):412, 414, 416-22. PubMed ID: 22068140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of the canine skin barrier restoration following acute disruption by tape stripping.
    Vidémont E; Mariani C; Vidal S; Pin D
    Vet Dermatol; 2012 Apr; 23(2):103-9, e23. PubMed ID: 22188585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical and physiological effects of stratum corneum tape stripping.
    Bashir SJ; Chew AL; Anigbogu A; Dreher F; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2001 Feb; 7(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 11301640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newborn transepidermal water loss values: a reference dataset.
    Kelleher MM; O'Carroll M; Gallagher A; Murray DM; Dunn Galvin A; Irvine AD; Hourihane JO
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2013; 30(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 23458265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of epidermal damage by tape stripping to evaluate skin mildness of cleansing regimens for the premature epidermal barrier.
    O'Connor RJ; Ogle J; Odio M
    Int J Dermatol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 1():21-7. PubMed ID: 27311783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping.
    Lu N; Chandar P; Tempesta D; Vincent C; Bajor J; McGuiness H
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Apr; 36(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24397786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new methodology for evaluating the damage to the skin barrier caused by repeated application and removal of adhesive dressings.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e366-74. PubMed ID: 22694144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
    Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transepidermal water vapour loss is not increased during and following dithranol irritation.
    Snater E; Janssen EA; van der Valk PG; van de Kerkhof PC
    Br J Dermatol; 1995 Jun; 132(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 7662568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.