These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9330443)

  • 1. Ultrasonic characterization of tissues via backscatter frequency dependence.
    Stetson P; Sommer G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(7):989-96. PubMed ID: 9330443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospects for ultrasonic spectroscopy and spectral imaging of abdominal tissues.
    Sommer FG; Stetson P; Chen HS; Stern RA; Rachlin DJ; Macovski A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Feb; 12(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 8468741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of ultrasound frequency on the Nakagami statistics of human liver tissues.
    Tsui PH; Zhou Z; Lin YH; Hung CM; Chung SJ; Wan YL
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181789. PubMed ID: 28763461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
    McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic tissue characterization via 2-D spectrum analysis: theory and in vitro measurements.
    Liu T; Lizzi FL; Ketterling JA; Silverman RH; Kutcher GJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 17441250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-frequency ultrasound scattering from microspheres and single cells.
    Baddour RE; Sherar MD; Hunt JW; Czarnota GJ; Kolios MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):934-43. PubMed ID: 15759712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficients for weakly scattering, agar spheres in agar phantoms.
    King MR; Anderson JJ; Herd MT; Ma D; Haak A; Wirtzfeld LA; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):903-8. PubMed ID: 20707460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of tissue microstructure using ultrasonic backscatter: theory and technique for optimization using a Gaussian form factor.
    Oelze ML; Zachary JF; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1202-11. PubMed ID: 12243165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artifact reduction of ultrasound Nakagami imaging by combining multifocus image reconstruction and the noise-assisted correlation algorithm.
    Tsui PH; Tsai YW
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 24626567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.
    Raju BI; Srinivasan MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 11750754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of adaptive threshold filtering on ultrasonic nakagami parameter to detect variation in scatterer concentration.
    Tsui PH; Wan YL; Huang CC; Wang MC
    Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 21213568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of ultrasound echo decomposition using singular spectrum analysis.
    de Albuquerque Pereira WC; Maciel CD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Sep; 27(9):1231-8. PubMed ID: 11597364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using phase information in ultrasonic backscatter for in vivo liver analysis.
    Molthen RC; Narayanan VM; Shankar PM; Reid JM; Genis V; Forsberg F; Halpern EJ; Goldberg BB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Jan; 24(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 9483774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo breast tissue backscatter measurements with 7.5- and 10-MHz transducers.
    Anderson ME; Soo MS; Trahey GE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11295273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
    Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
    Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.