These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9330817)

  • 1. More positive patch test reactions with larger test chambers? Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
    Brasch J; Szliska C; Grabbe J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):118-20. PubMed ID: 9330817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association between size of test chamber and patch test reaction: a statistical reanalysis.
    Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A; Geier J; Brasch J; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9928799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study between the two patch test systems Finn chambers and Finn chambers AQUA.
    Luu H; Mowitz M; Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Isaksson M; Svedman C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2021 May; 84(5):290-298. PubMed ID: 33368411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left-versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Brasch J; Henseler T; Aberer W; Bäuerle G; Frosch PJ; Fuchs T; Fünfstück V; Kaiser G; Lischka GG; Pilz B
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Oct; 31(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 8089284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
    Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current trends in patch testing - new data from the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) and the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK).
    Mahler V; Geier J; Schnuch A
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2014 Jul; 12(7):583-92. PubMed ID: 24981472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey.
    Akasya-Hillenbrand E; Ozkaya-Bayazit E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jan; 46(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11918582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens.
    Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Nethercott JR; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1998 Jun; 38(6 Pt 1):911-8. PubMed ID: 9631997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
    Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
    Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel.
    Magen E; Mishal J; Schlesinger M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):370-1. PubMed ID: 17101019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of IQ-ultra and Finn Chambers test methodologies in detecting 10 common standard allergens that cause allergic contact dermatitis.
    Doumit J; Pratt M
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2012; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 22417991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of patch tests: comparison of identical test allergens from different commercial sources.
    Schiessl C; Wolber C; Strohal R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15059100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of aluminium release from Finn chambers under different in vitro test conditions of relevance for patch testing.
    Hedberg YS; Wei Z; Matura M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Nov; 83(5):380-386. PubMed ID: 32484247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
    Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013-2014.
    DeKoven JG; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Sasseville D; Maibach HI; Taylor JS; Marks JG; Fowler JF; Mathias CG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Zirwas MJ; Zug KA
    Dermatitis; 2017; 28(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 27775967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
    Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.