BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9331319)

  • 1. Rethinking the use of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma screening.
    Zappia JJ; O'Connor CA; Wiet RJ; Dinces EA
    Laryngoscope; 1997 Oct; 107(10):1388-92. PubMed ID: 9331319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of auditory brainstem response as a screening test for small acoustic neuromas.
    Gordon ML; Cohen NL
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 8572110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem response and magnetic resonance imaging for acoustic neuromas: costs by prevalence.
    Robinette MS; Bauch CD; Olsen WO; Cevette MJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Aug; 126(8):963-6. PubMed ID: 10922228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of auditory brainstem response audiometry in diagnosis of acoustic neuromas.
    Chandrasekhar SS; Brackmann DE; Devgan KK
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8579179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The sensitivity of auditory brainstem response testing for the diagnosis of acoustic neuromas.
    Schmidt RJ; Sataloff RT; Newman J; Spiegel JR; Myers DL
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Jan; 127(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 11177009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sensitivity of auditory brainstem response testing in small acoustic neuromas.
    Wilson DF; Hodgson RS; Gustafson MF; Hogue S; Mills L
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):961-4. PubMed ID: 1518359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma screening.
    Godey B; Morandi X; Beust L; Brassier G; Bourdinière J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Jul; 118(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 9726673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory brain stem response in small acoustic neuromas.
    El-Kashlan HK; Eisenmann D; Kileny PR
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 10890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the efficiency of retrocochlear screening.
    Kotlarz JP; Eby TL; Borton TE
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Oct; 102(10):1108-12. PubMed ID: 1405961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brain stem response amplitude.
    Don M; Masuda A; Nelson R; Brackmann D
    Am J Otol; 1997 Sep; 18(5):608-21; discussion 682-5. PubMed ID: 9303158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical presentation and diagnosis of small acoustic neurinomas].
    Höhmann D; Dornhoffer JL
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 8060451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost comparison of auditory brainstem response versus magnetic resonance imaging screening of acoustic neuroma.
    Cheng G; Smith R; Tan AK
    J Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 14967086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic Approaches for Vestibular Schwannoma Based on Hearing Threshold Differences Between Ears: Added Value of Auditory Brainstem Responses.
    Metselaar M; Demirtas G; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff M
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Dec; 36(10):1610-5. PubMed ID: 26485589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical appraisal of the role of auditory brain stem response and magnetic resonance imaging in acoustic neuroma diagnosis.
    Wilson DF; Talbot JM; Mills L
    Am J Otol; 1997 Sep; 18(5):673-81. PubMed ID: 9303169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative value of diagnostic tests for small acoustic neuromas.
    Levine SC; Antonelli PJ; Le CT; Haines SJ
    Am J Otol; 1991 Sep; 12(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 1789302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specificity of auditory brainstem response audiometry criteria in acoustic neuroma screening as a function of deviations of reference values in patients with cochlear hearing loss.
    Gstoettner W; Neuwirth-Riedl K; Swoboda H; Mostbeck W; Burian M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1992; 249(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 1524805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative measurements of auditory-evoked potentials in three patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Tanaka H; Komatsuzaki A; Hentona H; Noguchi Y
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1997; 59(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9279866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sound lateralization testing based on interaural intensity difference discrimination and interaural time difference discrimination in acoustic neurinoma patients--comparison of ABRS].
    Takeda H; Kumakawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jan; 99(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 8822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current status of ABR audiometry in acoustic neuroma diagnosis.
    Brackmann DE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):235. PubMed ID: 10037295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic reflexes, auditory brainstem response, and MRI in the evaluation of acoustic neuromas.
    Burkey JM; Rizer FM; Schuring AG; Fucci MJ; Lippy WH
    Laryngoscope; 1996 Jul; 106(7):839-41. PubMed ID: 8667979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.