269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9332053)
1. [Which scientific article is best qualified for publication?].
Barzilai M
Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):25-6. PubMed ID: 9332053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peering into the review process.
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality in epidemiological research: should we be submitting papers before we have the results and submitting more hypothesis-generating research?
Lawlor DA
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):940-3. PubMed ID: 17875575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Editing of articles accepted for publication by the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].
Walvoort HC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Jan; 141(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 9162848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
Enserink M
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review should continue after publication.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
Fisher RS; Powers LE
Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals].
Trilla A
Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical writing and publication.
Taylor RB
Fam Med; 1989; 21(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 2792611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
Loría A; Lisker R
Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The need to improve the quality of scientific manuscripts published in Nigerian biomedical journals.
Laabes EP; Glew RH
West Afr J Med; 2007; 26(2):160. PubMed ID: 17939322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
