These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9333342)

  • 1. Finite mixture models for proportions.
    Brooks SP; Morgan BJ; Ridout MS; Pack SE
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1097-115. PubMed ID: 9333342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments.
    Kupper LL; Haseman JK
    Biometrics; 1978 Mar; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 564719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling sub-binomial variation in the frequency of sex combinations in litters of pigs.
    Brooks RJ; James WH; Gray E
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 1912254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data.
    George EO; Bowman D
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):512-23. PubMed ID: 7662840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of embryonic development with a model for under- or overdispersion relative to binomial variation.
    Engel B; te Brake J
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):269-79. PubMed ID: 8513109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified approach for analyzing exchangeable binary data with applications to developmental toxicity studies.
    Dang X; Keeton SL; Peng H
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2580-604. PubMed ID: 19548299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias properties of Bayesian statistics in finite mixture of negative binomial regression models in crash data analysis.
    Park BJ; Lord D; Hart JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):741-9. PubMed ID: 20159102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of some statistical methods for analysing numbers of abnormalities found amongst litters in teratology studies.
    Shirley EA; Hickling R
    Biometrics; 1981 Dec; 37(4):819-29. PubMed ID: 7199944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions.
    Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 18932137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An application of the clumped binomial model to the analysis of clustered attribute data.
    Koch GG; Tolley HD; Freeman JL
    Biometrics; 1976 Jun; 32(2):337-54. PubMed ID: 986196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of two-component mixtures of lognormal distributions in grouped, doubly truncated data: analysis of red blood cell volume distributions.
    McLaren CE; Wagstaff M; Brittenham GM; Jacobs A
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):607-22. PubMed ID: 1912264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for comparing the means of two independent log-normal samples.
    Zhou XH; Gao S; Hui SL
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1129-35. PubMed ID: 9290231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Order-restricted tests for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions.
    Agresti A; Coull BA
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 8805770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capture-recapture estimation using finite mixtures of arbitrary dimension.
    Arnold R; Hayakawa Y; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):644-55. PubMed ID: 19522870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose-dependent number of implants and implications in developmental toxicity.
    Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):558-69. PubMed ID: 9629644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of overdispersed count data by mixtures of Poisson variables and Poisson processes.
    Hougaard P; Lee ML; Whitmore GA
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1225-38. PubMed ID: 9423246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigations of the problems of assessing aflatoxin levels in peanuts.
    Giesbrecht FG; Whitaker TB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):739-53. PubMed ID: 9629654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum Hellinger distance estimation for k-component poisson mixture with random effects.
    Xiang L; Yau KK; Van Hui Y; Lee AH
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):508-18. PubMed ID: 17970817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.