These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9334760)

  • 1. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants.
    Kileny PR; Boerst A; Zwolan T
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):161-9. PubMed ID: 9334760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials.
    Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):429-35. PubMed ID: 12403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Early auditory processing of speech in prelingually-deafened children with cochlear implants based on event-related potentials].
    Xu XR; Sun JQ; Guan RR; Guo XT; Sun JW
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Jul; 59(7):705-713. PubMed ID: 39107118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in unsuccessful cochlear implant users.
    Munivrana B; Mildner V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2013 Jul; 27(6-7):472-83. PubMed ID: 23621479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: an auditory event-related potentials study.
    Henkin Y; Kileny PR; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18595188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a change in P300 evoked potential after 6 months in cochlear implant users?
    Amaral MSAD; Calderaro VG; Pauna HF; Massuda ET; Reis ACMB; Hyppolito MA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022; 88 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S50-S58. PubMed ID: 34799269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users.
    Hoppe U; Rosanowski F; Iro H; Eysholdt U
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 11409789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects.
    Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N400 and short speech stimuli.
    Munivrana Dervišbegović B; Mildner V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020; 34(1-2):21-28. PubMed ID: 31342799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children.
    Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ; Mahmoudian S; Ashayeri H; Allaeddini F; Farhadi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.
    Swink S; Stuart A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 22199192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Jansson-Verkasalo E; Eggers K; Järvenpää A; Suominen K; Van den Bergh B; De Nil L; Kujala T
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25066139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.