These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9335195)

  • 21. AAPL Practice Guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense.
    American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL)
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4 Suppl):S3-S76. PubMed ID: 25492121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of criminal responsibility reports submitted to the Hawaii judiciary.
    Fuger KD; Acklin MW; Nguyen AH; Ignacio LA; Gowensmith WN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 24326082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fitness, responsibility, and judicially ordered assessments.
    Ohayon MM; Crocker A; St-Onge B; Caulet M
    Can J Psychiatry; 1998 Jun; 43(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 9653533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of repeated forensic evaluations of legal sanity.
    Kacperska I; Heitzman J; Bąk T; Leśko AW; Opio M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 44():24-9. PubMed ID: 26346685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of state organizational structure and forensic examiner training on pretrial competence assessments.
    Edens JF; Poythress NG; Nicholson RA; Otto RK
    J Behav Health Serv Res; 1999 May; 26(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 10230143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Progress in standard assessment on competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders].
    Chen XB; Cai WX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 28(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23033670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
    Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can defendants with mental retardation successfully fake their performance on a test of competence to stand trial?
    Everington C; Notario-Smull H; Horton ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):545-60. PubMed ID: 17486631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The use of operational criteria for evaluations of mental competency].
    Kocha H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2013; 115(10):1057-63. PubMed ID: 24341072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Difference between the cognitive and control ability and the responsibility in forensic psychiatry evaluation].
    Li XW; Gao BL; Hu F; Wu C; Zhang H; Guan YJ; Lai W; Li Y; Wang Y; Wu DL; Cao XL
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 24350541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Competency to stand trial in preadjudicated and petitioned juvenile defendants.
    Baerger DR; Griffin EF; Lyons JS; Simmons R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 14584530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of third-party information in forensic assessments: a two-state comparison.
    Heilbrun K; Rosenfeld B; Warren J; Collins S
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 7841511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Investigation of verdicts in lawsuits involving competency to stand trial].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2006; 108(11):1128-41. PubMed ID: 17313060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An ethical framework for assessments of criminal responsibility: applying Susan Wolf's account of sanity to forensic psychiatry.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Public evaluations of unrepresented defendants.
    Miller RD; Olin J; Beven G; Covey J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 7599376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.