These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9335398)

  • 1. Effects of long-term amiodarone treatment on ventricular-fibrillation vulnerability and defibrillation efficacy in response to monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 30(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 9335398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
    Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.
    Behrens S; Li C; Kirchhof P; Fabritz FL; Franz MR
    Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1974-80. PubMed ID: 8873676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of myocardial ischemia on ventricular fibrillation inducibility and defibrillation efficacy.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 29(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 9091529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks.
    Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN
    Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses.
    Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR
    Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.
    Hohnloser SH; Dorian P; Roberts R; Gent M; Israel CW; Fain E; Champagne J; Connolly SJ
    Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16818810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of acute amiodarone on short- and long-duration ventricular defibrillation threshold in canines.
    Wu L; Jin Q; Zhang N; Pang Y; Ren S; Zhou J; Lin C; Ling T; Gu G; Shen W; Huang J; Huang C
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2011 Oct; 58(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 21709582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of hypothyroidism on the vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation in dogs: a comparative study with amiodarone.
    Liu P; Fei L; Wu W; Li J; Wang J; Zhang X
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 1996 Jul; 10(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 8877081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on the defibrillation threshold in comparison to patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment.
    Kühlkamp V; Mewis C; Suchalla R; Mermi J; Dörnberger V; Seipel L
    Int J Cardiol; 1999 Jun; 69(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 10402110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.
    Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of the upper limit of vulnerability during defibrillator implantation can substitute defibrillation threshold measurement.
    Bessho R; Tanaka S
    Int J Artif Organs; 1998 Mar; 21(3):151-60. PubMed ID: 9622114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Bollmann A; Husser D; Cannom DS
    Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2005; 5(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 16259525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns and defibrillation threshold during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.
    Huang J; Skinner JL; Rogers JM; Smith WM; Holman WL; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jul; 40(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 12106947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal strength and number of shocks at upper limit of vulnerability testing required to predict high defibrillation threshold without inducing ventricular fibrillation.
    Takami K; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Takei A; Kiuchi K; Kanda G; Kumagai H; Takami M; Torii-Tanaka S; Itoh M; Imamura K; Fujiwara R; Suzuki A; Nakanishi T; Yamashita S; Matsumoto A; Hirata K
    Circ J; 2013; 77(10):2490-6. PubMed ID: 23877733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ibutilide Reduces Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold and Organizes Ventricular Fibrillation Activation in Canine Heart Failure Model.
    Zhang N; Luo Q; Jin Q; Han Y; Huang S; Wei Y; Lin C; Chen K; Shen W; Wu L
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 2020 Jun; 34(3):323-334. PubMed ID: 32297025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High dispersion of ventricular repolarization after an implantable defibrillator shock predicts induction of ventricular fibrillation as well as unsuccessful defibrillation.
    Moubarak JB; Karasik PE; Fletcher RD; Franz MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 35(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 10676690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.