460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9336753)
1. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gamete intrafallopian transfer. A cost-effective alternative to donor oocyte in vitro fertilization in women aged 40-42 years.
Silva PD; Olson KL; Meisch JK; Silva DE
J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1019-22. PubMed ID: 9883404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technologies in Thailand: 2001-2007 results generated from the ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Vutyavanich T; Piromlertamorn W; Ellis J; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Mar; 37(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 21272157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcervical gamete and zygote intrafallopian transfer. Does it enhance pregnancy rates in an assisted reproduction program?
Hurst BS; Tucker KE; Guadagnoli S; Awoniyi CA; Schlaff WD
J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):867-70. PubMed ID: 8951140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 9531864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1992 results generated from the American Fertility Society/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
Fertil Steril; 1994 Dec; 62(6):1121-8. PubMed ID: 7957974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-effectiveness comparison of embryo donation with oocyte donation.
Finger R; Sommerfelt C; Freeman M; Wilson CK; Wade A; Daly D
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):379-81. PubMed ID: 19406398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1991 results from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology generated from the American Fertility Society Registry.
Fertil Steril; 1993 May; 59(5):956-62. PubMed ID: 8486195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.
Bouwmans CA; Lintsen BM; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD; Braat DD; Hakkaart L
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 17662286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of singleton versus twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization.
Lukassen HG; Schönbeck Y; Adang EM; Braat DD; Zielhuis GA; Kremer JA
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1240-6. PubMed ID: 15136084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.
Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Danish National IVF Registry 1994 and 1995. Treatment, pregnancy outcome and complications during pregnancy.
Westergaard HB; Johansen AM; Erb K; Andersen AN
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 May; 79(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 10830766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
