These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9336957)
1. Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. Mark LS; Nemeth K; Gardner D; Dainoff MJ; Paasche J; Duffy M; Grandt K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Oct; 23(5):1365-79. PubMed ID: 9336957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of object weight, reach distance, discomfort and muscle activation on the location of preferred critical boundary during a seated reaching task. Petrovic M; Berg WP; Mark LS; Hughes MR Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Dec; 44():122-33. PubMed ID: 26340277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pivots for pointing: visually-monitored pointing has higher arm elevations than pointing blindfolded. Wnuczko M; Kennedy JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1485-91. PubMed ID: 21688946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of task constraint on reaching performance in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Ju YH; You JY; Cherng RJ Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 20434308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociation between perception and visuomotor transformation during reproduction of remembered distances. Gentilucci M; Negrotti A J Neurophysiol; 1994 Oct; 72(4):2026-30. PubMed ID: 7823116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference. Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fitts's law in a selective reaching task: the proximity-to-hand effect of action-centered attention revisited. Welsh TN; Zbinden M Motor Control; 2009 Jan; 13(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 19246781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances. Fajen BR; Diaz G; Cramer C Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Jun; 30(3):504-33. PubMed ID: 21333367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How do somersaulters land on their feet? Lee DN; Young DS; Rewt D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1195-202. PubMed ID: 1431752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doggone affordances: Canine perception of affordances for reaching. Wagman JB; Langley MD; Farmer-Dougan V Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 28168679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information. Waller D; Richardson AR J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-visually-guided distance perception depends on matching torso fluctuations between training and test. Teng DW; Eddy CL; Kelty-Stephen DG Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2320-2328. PubMed ID: 27739017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tuning in to another person's action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics. Ramenzoni V; Riley MA; Davis T; Shockley K; Armstrong R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 18665735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. Soechting JF; Flanders M J Neurophysiol; 1993 Sep; 70(3):1137-50. PubMed ID: 8229163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impaired posture, movement preparation, and execution during both paretic and nonparetic reaching following stroke. Yang CL; Creath RA; Magder L; Rogers MW; McCombe Waller S J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1465-1477. PubMed ID: 30785824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Vishton PM; Rea JG; Cutting JE; Nuñez LN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1659-72. PubMed ID: 10641314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components. Chieffi S; Fogassi L; Gallese V; Gentilucci M Neuropsychologia; 1992 Oct; 30(10):877-97. PubMed ID: 1436435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Braking reaching movements: a test of the constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions. Hopkins B; Churchill A; Vogt S; Rönnqvist L J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 14766484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]