These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9337340)
1. Genes to order: regulators struggle against future abuses. Jenks S J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Oct; 89(20):1478-9. PubMed ID: 9337340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FDA regulation: an answer to the questions of human cloning and germline gene therapy. Willgoos C Am J Law Med; 2001; 27(1):101-24. PubMed ID: 11367820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Making a production over reproductions. Kahn JP J Androl; 2001; 22(4):532. PubMed ID: 11451348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FDA regulation of human cloning: usurpation or statesmanship? Merrill RA; Rose BJ Harv J Law Technol; 2001; 15(1):85-148. PubMed ID: 15156886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The first clone. Fischer J US News World Rep; 2001 Dec; 131(23):50-4, 57-8, 60-3. PubMed ID: 11765373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human tissues and reproductive cloning: new technologies challenge FDA. Merrill RA Houst J Health Law Policy; 2002; 3(1):1-82. PubMed ID: 15712415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulating (for the benefit of) future persons: a different perspective on the FDA's jurisdiction to regulate human reproductive cloning. Javitt GH; Hudson K Utah Law Rev; 2003; 2003(4):1201-29. PubMed ID: 15622618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cloning and stem cells: processes, politics, and policy. Curtis MG Curr Womens Health Rep; 2003 Dec; 3(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 14613671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cloning: the work not done. Callahan D Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 9383661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legislation of human cloning in the United States. SoRelle R Circulation; 1998 May; 97(19):1889. PubMed ID: 9609077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Panels' conflicting views cloud legal future of human cloning. Check E Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6870):351-2. PubMed ID: 11807506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. As US DNA advisory body redefines itself. Wadman M Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive genetics 1991-2002: a selected annotated legal bibliography of genetic testing, gene transfer and reproductive cloning. Javitt GH J Health Care Law Policy; 2003; 6(2):317-80. PubMed ID: 15017957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US deliberates on embryonic stem cells, cloning. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):791. PubMed ID: 11533619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fears of cults and kooks push Congress towards cloning ban. Smaglik P Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):617. PubMed ID: 11287910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulators equivocate on safety of clones. Powell K Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1415-6. PubMed ID: 14647311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Panels jockey for position in US debate on cloning. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):207. PubMed ID: 11875403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The emperor's new clones. Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):1. PubMed ID: 17211372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The politics of principles. Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):789. PubMed ID: 11533618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Executive summary of cloning human beings: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 10075517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]