These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9337578)

  • 1. Features and their configuration in face recognition.
    Tanaka JW; Sengco JA
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 9337578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.
    Boutet I; Collin C; Faubert J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1078-93. PubMed ID: 14674634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Configural coding, expertise, and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition.
    Rhodes G
    Brain Cogn; 1993 May; 22(1):19-41. PubMed ID: 8499110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.
    Kemp R; McManus C; Pigott T
    Perception; 1990; 19(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 2096371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parts and wholes in face recognition.
    Tanaka JW; Farah MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1993 May; 46(2):225-45. PubMed ID: 8316637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.
    McKone E; Peh YX
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remembering facial configurations.
    Bruce V; Doyle T; Dench N; Burton M
    Cognition; 1991 Feb; 38(2):109-44. PubMed ID: 2049903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognizing degraded faces: the contribution of configural and featural cues.
    Gilad-Gutnick S; Sinha P
    Perception; 2012; 41(12):1497-511. PubMed ID: 23586289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caricature and face recognition.
    Mauro R; Kubovy M
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 1495405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention misplaced: the role of diagnostic features in the face-inversion effect.
    Hills PJ; Ross DA; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1396-406. PubMed ID: 21728458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What gives a face its gender?
    Brown E; Perrett DI
    Perception; 1993; 22(7):829-40. PubMed ID: 8115240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces.
    Roberts T; Bruce V
    Perception; 1988; 17(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 3244520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition.
    Cooper EE; Wojan TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):470-88. PubMed ID: 10764107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.
    Moscovitch M; Moscovitch DA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 17(1):201-19. PubMed ID: 20945180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.