These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 933852)

  • 1. The control of self-mutilating behavior with positive reinforcement.
    Ragain RD; Anson JE
    Ment Retard; 1976 Jun; 14(3):22-5. PubMed ID: 933852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To what behaviors do attending adults respond?
    Warren SA; Mondy LW
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Jan; 75(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 5547934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in extinction of operant responding by educable retarded and nonretarded children.
    Thor DH
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 Jul; 77(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 5052419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three procedures in reducing self-injurious behavior.
    Lucero WJ; Frieman J; Spoering K; Fehrenbacher J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Mar; 80(5):548-54. PubMed ID: 1275004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-injurious behavior in schizophrenic and retarded children.
    Frankel F; Simmons JQ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Mar; 80(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 5892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extinction procedures: proceed with caution.
    Gilbert GO
    Ment Retard; 1975 Dec; 13(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 1196124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of operant techniques for the modification of self-injurious behavior.
    Smolev SR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 5148357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of self-injurious behavior by a combination of reinforcement for incompatible behavior and overcorrection.
    Measel CJ; Alfieri PA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Sep; 81(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 970412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head hitting in severely retarded children.
    Geiger JK; Sindberg RM; Barnes CM
    Am J Nurs; 1974 Oct; 74(10):1822-5. PubMed ID: 4496781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extinction, DRO, and response-cost procedures for eliminating self-injurious behavior: a case study.
    Myers DV
    Behav Res Ther; 1975 Jun; 13(2-3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1164376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a positive procedure to increase engagement on-task and decrease challenging behavior.
    Beare PL; Severson S; Brandt P
    Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 14710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of operant conditioning to the self-destructive behavior of retarded children.
    Whitney LR
    ANA Clin Conf; 1965; 3():54-9. PubMed ID: 5177586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of operant conditioning under delayed reinforcement in early infancy.
    Millar WS
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1972; 37(2):1-44. PubMed ID: 5073989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement preferences of severely mentally retarded children in a generalized reinforcement context.
    Watson LS
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Mar; 72(5):748-56. PubMed ID: 5646277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Schedule-induced narcotic ingestion.
    Leander JD; McMillan DE
    Pharmacol Rev; 1975 Dec; 27(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 4822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is reinforcement necessary for the development of a generalized imitation operant in severely and profoundly retarded children?
    Bry PM; Nawas MM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 May; 76(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 5031087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Case study: use of differential reinforcement to suppress self-injurious and aggressive behavior.
    Frankel F; Moss D; Schofield S; Simmons JQ
    Psychol Rep; 1976 Dec; 39(3):843-9. PubMed ID: 1005604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of frequency of photic stimulation upon autistic and retarded children.
    Frankel F; Freeman BJ; Ritvo E; Chikami B; Carr E
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Jul; 81(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 941931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the difference in resistance to extinction following regular and periodic reinforcement.
    Schoenfeld WN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 5660706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.