BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9338871)

  • 21. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
    Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
    Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stress distribution in the single-unit osseointegrated dental implant: finite element analyses of axial and off-axial loading.
    O'Mahony A; Bowles Q; Woolsey G; Robinson SJ; Spencer P
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11307407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 8078657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of tooth mobility on critical stresses in all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: a finite element study.
    Möllers K; Parkot D; Kirsten A; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Fischer H
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22104732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An experimental analysis of the stresses on the implant in an implant-tooth-supported prosthesis: a technical note.
    Uysal H; Iplikçioğlu H; Avci M; Gündüz Bilir O; Kural O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 9048464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 91(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 15060492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nonsimultaneous tooth contact in combined implant and natural tooth occlusal schemes.
    Kerstein RB
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(9):751-5. PubMed ID: 11862925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part II: therapeutic differential loading.
    Weinberg LA
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):302-10. PubMed ID: 12498438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses--a review.
    Sahin S; Cehreli MC; Yalçin E
    J Dent; 2002; 30(7-8):271-82. PubMed ID: 12554107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses.
    White SN; Caputo AA; Anderkvist T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 May; 71(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 8006846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 11966968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis.
    Bozkaya D; Muftu S; Muftu A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 15583556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system.
    Romeo E; Lops D; Margutti E; Ghisolfi M; Chiapasco M; Vogel G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 15101597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.