These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9339492)
1. Children's and adolescents' anaerobic performance during cycle ergometry. Williams CA Sports Med; 1997 Oct; 24(4):227-40. PubMed ID: 9339492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a prior force-velocity test performed with legs on subsequent peak power output measured with arms or vice versa. Bouhlel E; Chelly MS; Gmada N; Tabka Z; Shephard R J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Apr; 24(4):992-8. PubMed ID: 20300028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A test to assess aerobic and anaerobic parameters during maximal exercise in young girls. McGawley K; Leclair E; Dekerle J; Carter H; Williams CA Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2012 May; 24(2):262-74. PubMed ID: 22728417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Force-velocity and power-velocity relationships during maximal short-term rowing ergometry. Sprague RC; Martin JC; Davidson CJ; Farrar RP Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Feb; 39(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 17277601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic power and muscle strength in human immunodeficiency virus-positive preadolescents. Ramos E; Guttierrez-Teissoonniere S; Conde JG; Baez-Cordova JA; Guzman-Villar B; Lopategui-Corsino E; Frontera WR PM R; 2012 Mar; 4(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 22364955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral deficit during short-term, high-intensity cycle ergometry in girls and boys. Dunstheimer D; Hebestreit H; Staschen B; Strassburg HM; Jeschke R Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Jun; 84(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 11482551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test. Coleman SG; Hale T Can J Appl Physiol; 1998 Aug; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 9677437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of anaerobic power values from an abbreviated WAnT protocol. Stickley CD; Hetzler RK; Kimura IF J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):958-65. PubMed ID: 18438215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anaerobic fitness tests: what are we measuring? Praagh EV Med Sport Sci; 2007; 50():26-45. PubMed ID: 17387250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance and blood lactate on Gjessing and Concept II rowing ergometers. Lormes W; Buckwitz R; Rehbein H; Steinacker JM Int J Sports Med; 1993 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():S29-31. PubMed ID: 8262703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global changes in anaerobic fitness test performance of children and adolescents (1958-2003). Tomkinson GR Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Oct; 17(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 17181769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term muscle power during growth and maturation. Van Praagh E; Doré E Sports Med; 2002; 32(11):701-28. PubMed ID: 12196031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of the Wingate anaerobic mechanical power outputs from a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise stress test using machine-learning approach. Leopold E; Navot-Mintzer D; Shargal E; Tsuk S; Tuller T; Scheinowitz M PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212199. PubMed ID: 30861009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The 1,500-m Rowing Performance is Highly Dependent on Modified Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance in National-Level Adolescent Rowers. Maciejewski H; Rahmani A; Chorin F; Lardy J; Giroux C; Ratel S Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2016 Nov; 28(4):572-579. PubMed ID: 27633491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of prior upper body exercise on subsequent wingate performance. Grant MC; Robergs R; Baird MF; Baker JS Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():329328. PubMed ID: 24895566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface electromyographic activities of upper body muscles during high-intensity cycle ergometry. McCormick MC; Watson H; Simpson A; Kilgore L; Baker JS Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(2):124-35. PubMed ID: 24650333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of step aerobics training on anaerobic performance of men and women. Kin-Isler A; Kosar SN J Strength Cond Res; 2006 May; 20(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 16686565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the modified Conconi test on concept II rowing ergometers. Celik O; Koşar SN; Korkusuz F; Bozkurt M J Strength Cond Res; 2005 Nov; 19(4):871-7. PubMed ID: 16287355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between anaerobic power and jumping of selected male volleyball players of different ages. Kasabalis A; Douda H; Tokmakidis SP Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):607-14. PubMed ID: 16060419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of physiological responses to rowing on friction-loaded and air-braked ergometers. Mahony N; Donne B; O'Brien M J Sports Sci; 1999 Feb; 17(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 10069271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]