BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9339537)

  • 1. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(2):187-214. PubMed ID: 10696275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preparatory attention: experiment and theory.
    LaBerge D; Auclair L; Sieroff E
    Conscious Cogn; 2000 Sep; 9(3):396-434. PubMed ID: 10993667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter identification and lateral masking in dyslexic and average readers.
    Goolkasian P; King J
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(4):519-38. PubMed ID: 2275487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hand in blindsight: hand placement near target improves size perception in the blind visual field.
    Brown LE; Kroliczak G; Demonet JF; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):786-802. PubMed ID: 18206962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.
    Sally SL; Vidnyánsky Z; Papathomas TV
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):529-53. PubMed ID: 19891852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A high-loaded hemisphere successfully ignores distractors.
    Nishimura R; Yoshizaki K
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):953-61. PubMed ID: 20580269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach].
    Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus size scaling and foveal load as determinants of peripheral target detection.
    Chan HS; Courtney AJ
    Ergonomics; 1998 Oct; 41(10):1433-52. PubMed ID: 9802251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of unilateral distractors: a comparison of eye movement and key press responses.
    Machado L; Franz E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1173-90. PubMed ID: 15513242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.