149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9340750)
1. Furor over company deal roils AMA.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Oct; 278(5335):26. PubMed ID: 9340750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Doctors' dilemma.
Gorman C
Time; 1997 Aug; 150(8):64. PubMed ID: 10170204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AMA prepares report. Local chapters seek further investigation into Sunbeam deal.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(39):14. PubMed ID: 10173608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AMA in drive to keep industry role.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1996 Oct; 26(41):52, 54. PubMed ID: 10161912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The great American sell-a-thon.
Meskin LH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Nov; 128(11):1488-92. PubMed ID: 9368427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. AMA aims for ethical high road following Sunbeam disaster.
Brower V
Nat Med; 1997 Nov; 3(11):1183. PubMed ID: 9359677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Corporate visitation program enables AMA to strengthen its ties with business.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 10253020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. FTC rules against AMA advertising code.
Am Nurse; 1979 Jan; 11(1):11, 14. PubMed ID: 254567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Seward departs AMA. Next question: will trustees survive Sunbeam debacle?
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1997 Dec; 27(49):2, 16. PubMed ID: 10175003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AMA fiasco leaves docs with mixed reactions.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(39):15. PubMed ID: 10173609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three AMA execs lose jobs in wake of Sunbeam scandal.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):3. PubMed ID: 10170395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prescription for conflict. AMA accepts funding from drug firms for campaign.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jun; 31(25):14. PubMed ID: 11436381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Two views on funding. Drug firm's financial support of AMA ethics campaign poses a debate.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2001 Apr; 31(17):12. PubMed ID: 11338891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Case study--FTC vs. AMA.
Stratton DJ
Assoc Manage; 1979 Jan; 31(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 10239940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gag rules and trade secrets in managed care contracts. Ethical and legal concerns.
Brody H; Bonham VL
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 157(18):2037-43. PubMed ID: 9382657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Broadening the base. Despite some criticism, the AMA gives its marketing database another go.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2001 Oct; 31(44):20-1. PubMed ID: 11715735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics in the dental profession-2006.
Christensen GJ
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 16911414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The AMA takes umbrage.
Reardon TR
Am J Nurs; 2000 Dec; 100(12):14. PubMed ID: 11202775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Business ethics.
Lavin JH
Med Econ; 1979 Mar; 56(5):229-33, 237-40. PubMed ID: 10240634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The business of ethics: gender, medicine, and the professional codification of the American Physiotherapy Association, 1918-1935.
Linker B
J Hist Med Allied Sci; 2005 Jul; 60(3):320-54. PubMed ID: 15917259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
