These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9341691)

  • 1. Cerebral angiography practices at US teaching hospitals. Implications for carotid endarterectomy.
    Chaturvedi S; Policherla PN; Femino L
    Stroke; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1895-7. PubMed ID: 9341691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US National Survey of Physician Practices for the Secondary and Tertiary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke. Carotid endarterectomy.
    Goldstein LB; Bonito AJ; Matchar DB; Duncan PW; Samsa GP
    Stroke; 1996 May; 27(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 8623096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical decision making for carotid endarterectomy and contemporary magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ozaki CK; Irwin PB; Flynn TC; Huber TS; Seeger JM
    Am J Surg; 1999 Sep; 178(3):182-4. PubMed ID: 10527434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of carotid ultrasound in evaluating candidates for carotid endarterectomy is optimized by an approach based on clinical outcome rather than accuracy.
    Wilterdink JL; Feldmann E; Easton JD; Ward R
    Stroke; 1996 Jun; 27(6):1094-8. PubMed ID: 8650720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carotid endarterectomy in a teaching hospital.
    Lyden PD; Rothrock JF; Taft BJ
    Stroke; 1989 Jul; 20(7):968-9. PubMed ID: 2749857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.
    Eliasziw M; Smith RF; Singh N; Holdsworth DW; Fox AJ; Barnett HJ
    Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of carotid stenosis. From NASCET results to clinical practice.
    Chang YJ; Golby AJ; Albers GW
    Stroke; 1995 Aug; 26(8):1325-8. PubMed ID: 7631330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of Canadian and U.S. neurologists regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis.
    Chaturvedi S; Meinke JL; St Pierre E; Bertasio B
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2000 May; 27(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 10830343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distribution of vascular lesions in ischaemic stroke: a magnetic resonance angiographic study.
    Padma MV; Gaikwad S; Jain S; Maheshwari MC; Misra NK
    Natl Med J India; 1997; 10(5):217-20. PubMed ID: 9401380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of conventional angiography in evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound in general practice.
    Qureshi AI; Suri MF; Ali Z; Kim SH; Fessler RD; Ringer AJ; Guterman LR; Budny JL; Hopkins LN
    Stroke; 2001 Oct; 32(10):2287-91. PubMed ID: 11588315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US national survey of physician practices for the secondary and tertiary prevention of ischemic stroke. Design, service availability, and common practices.
    Goldstein LB; Bonito AJ; Matchar DB; Duncan PW; DeFriese GH; Oddone EZ; Paul JE; Akin DR; Samsa GP
    Stroke; 1995 Sep; 26(9):1607-15. PubMed ID: 7660407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery.
    Müller M; Bartylla K; Rolshausen A; Piepgras U; Schimrigk K
    Vasa; 1998 Feb; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9540429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy.
    Hankey GJ; Warlow CP; Molyneux AJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1990 Jul; 53(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 2118171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: is it really safer than conventional angiography?
    Norris JW; Rothwell PM
    Neurology; 2001 Apr; 56(8):990-1. PubMed ID: 11320166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation prior to carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary: the argument against.
    Rothwell PM
    Stroke; 2003 Jul; 34(7):1817-9; discussion 1819. PubMed ID: 12829870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography].
    Tiev KP; Sevestre MA; Reix T; Auquier M; Cabane J; Dehouck B; Jounaville F; Idy Perretti I; Sentou Y; Remond A; Pietri J
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):325-331. PubMed ID: 11148393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.