These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9343334)

  • 1. The cervix cancer screening program in the UK.
    Koss LG
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1218-9. PubMed ID: 9343334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Cervical cytology: perspectives from both sides of the Atlantic".
    Lombard CM
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1217-9. PubMed ID: 9343332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing incidents in the cervical screening programme.
    Wilkinson MJ
    Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 11014655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pap smears are financially undervalued in the United States.
    Herbert A
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1218. PubMed ID: 9343333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health insurance and cancer screening among women.
    Makuc DM; Freid VM; Parsons PE
    Adv Data; 1994 Aug; (254):1-12. PubMed ID: 10138738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economics of screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Hicks S; Edwards D
    N Z Med J; 1986 Nov; 99(814):916. PubMed ID: 3468422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cervical screening muddle.
    Womack C; Warren AY
    Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129. PubMed ID: 9660601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cancer of the cervix and screening.
    Adelstein AM; Husain OA; Spriggs AI
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Feb; 282(6263):564. PubMed ID: 6780126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cytological mass screenings for the cancer of the cervix uteri. Resources, organization and costs].
    Kolstad P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Sep; 108(25):2057-60. PubMed ID: 3201418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cervix cancer screening can be cost-effective. Combination of vaginal smears and the HPV test should be even more beneficial].
    Bistoletti P; Ellström A; Dillner J; Sennfält K; Sparén P; Strander B
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Jun 13-26; 102(24-25):1874-6, 1878-9. PubMed ID: 16044766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
    Payne L; Lavis P
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards effective cervical screening.
    Havelock C; Havelock P
    Practitioner; 1994 Apr; 238(1537):296-301. PubMed ID: 8183816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer screening--an alternative viewpoint.
    Rogers A
    West Engl Med J; 1990 Sep; 105(3):77-9, 71. PubMed ID: 2093353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. THE PREVENTION OF CERVICAL CANCER. WHO TAKES THE SMEARS?
    WOLFENDALE M; HANDFIELD-JONES RP
    Lancet; 1964 Oct; 2(7365):901-2. PubMed ID: 14197196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Sasieni P
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling the implications for hospital services of cervical cytology screening: a case history.
    Boyd A; Davies LA; Bagust A
    J Oper Res Soc; 1989 Jun; 40(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 10293891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical smears: a questionable practice?
    McCormick JS
    Lancet; 1989 Jul; 2(8656):207-9. PubMed ID: 2568532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.