These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9343631)

  • 21. Technology assessment of two needleless systems.
    Horner KA
    J Intraven Nurs; 1998; 21(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 9866535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of a needleless system with conventional heparin locks.
    Adams KS; Zehrer CL; Thomas W
    Am J Infect Control; 1993 Oct; 21(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 8267238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changing practice in the subcutaneous infusion of fluids to improve safety.
    Reynolds A
    Prof Nurse; 2004 Nov; 20(3):50-1. PubMed ID: 15552442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Keeping i.v. therapy safe with needleless systems.
    Rosenthal K
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2003 Oct; Suppl():16-8, 20. PubMed ID: 14694862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Needleless connectors for IV catheters.
    Hadaway L
    Am J Nurs; 2012 Nov; 112(11):32-44; quiz 45. PubMed ID: 23075549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementation of a customized needleless intravenous delivery system.
    Terrell F; Williams B
    J Intraven Nurs; 1993; 16(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 8301406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Needleless intravenous systems: A review.
    Russo PL; Harrington GA; Spelman DW
    Am J Infect Control; 1999 Oct; 27(5):431-4. PubMed ID: 10511490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the microbial barrier properties of a needleless and a conventional needle-based intravenous access system.
    Luebke MA; Arduino MJ; Duda DL; Dudar TE; McAllister SK; Bland LA; Wesley JR
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Aug; 26(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 9721399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The interlink needleless intravenous system did not reduce the number of needlestick injuries in Christchurch hospital operating theatres.
    MacPherson J
    N Z Med J; 1996 Oct; 109(1031):387-8. PubMed ID: 8890881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The potential for catheter microbial contamination from a needleless connector.
    Brown JD; Moss HA; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 1997 Jul; 36(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 9253699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of a needleless intravenous access system at the University of Virginia Hospital.
    Fassel K; Coyner BJ; Jagger J
    QRC Advis; 1994 May; 10(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 10134073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries among professional Korean nurses.
    Smith DR; Choe MA; Jeong JS; Jeon MY; Chae YR; An GJ
    J Prof Nurs; 2006; 22(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 17141720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospital.
    Gartner K
    Am J Infect Control; 1992 Apr; 20(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 1590602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical acceptability and ease of use of a safety IV catheter system.
    Ruiz-Sternberg A; Velez-Van-Meerbeke A; Ruiz-Sternberg J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Aug; 28(8):1381-7. PubMed ID: 22738803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009740. PubMed ID: 24610008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
    Ippolito G; De Carli G; Puro V; Petrosillo N; Arici C; Bertucci R; Bianciardi L; Bonazzi L; Cestrone A; Daglio M
    JAMA; 1994 Aug 24-31; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prevalence of safer needle devices and factors associated with their adoption: results of a national hospital survey.
    Sinclair RC; Maxfield A; Marks EL; Thompson DR; Gershon RR
    Public Health Rep; 2002; 117(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 12477915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems.
    Orenstein R
    J Intraven Nurs; 1999; 22(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 10640075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. University hospital network evaluation of needleless i.v. systems.
    Sheehan MJ; White CA
    QRC Advis; 1994 May; 10(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 10134074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toronto hospital reduces sharps injuries by 80%, eliminates blood collection injuries. A case study: Toronto East General Hospital pioneers healthcare worker safety.
    Visser L
    Healthc Q; 2006; 9(1):68-70, 4. PubMed ID: 16548437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.