These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9344013)

  • 1. Do right by the disabled.
    Ulicny GR
    Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Oct; 71(19):10. PubMed ID: 9344013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bush administration tales next step in implementation of New Freedom Initiative.
    Psychiatr Serv; 2001 Sep; 52(9):1268. PubMed ID: 11550700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumers challenge accessibility under the ADA.
    Gregg RE
    J Med Pract Manage; 2006; 22(1):49. PubMed ID: 16986642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disabling the rights of Americans with disabilities: what should be done next?
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2005; 29(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 16224898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disabilities discrimination in public accommodations and services. What physicians need to know about the law.
    Burke FG
    Minn Med; 1991 Nov; 74(11):29-31. PubMed ID: 1838787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quarterly report of the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):v-vi. PubMed ID: 9029840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internal advocacy guidelines for rehabilitation professionals, parents and disabled adults advocating for the rights of all individuals with special needs.
    Massenzio S
    Am Arch Rehabil Ther; 1981; 29(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10317155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. After the Americans with Disabilities Act: the role of the rehabilitation community.
    Batavia A; DeJong G; Eckenhoff EA; Materson RS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 71(12):1014-5. PubMed ID: 2146939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dream ... an accessible America. Challenge for the clinician.
    Gaster LS
    ASHA; 1992; 34(6-7):42-3. PubMed ID: 1456979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rehabilitation institutions and the ADA.
    Disch Plann Update; 1992; 12(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 10171025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fair play on the housing front.
    Tamley K
    Caring; 1999 Jul; 18(7):6-8. PubMed ID: 10539560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rehabilitation legislation of the seventies and the severely disabled.
    Watson PG
    ARN J; 1979; 4(3):4-6, 8-11. PubMed ID: 157722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kudos to consumer corner.
    Webb BW
    ASHA; 1992 Sep; 34(9):5. PubMed ID: 1456995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CBPP ridicules governors' ideas to reduce medicaid costs. Advocacy group claims proposals endanger low-income, disabled benes.
    Med Health; 2005 Oct; 59(38):5, 8. PubMed ID: 16265840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Health care reform and disability: affirming our commitment to community.
    DeJong G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Oct; 74(10):1017-24. PubMed ID: 8215850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The digital divide.
    Mollica BM
    Assist Technol; 2000; 12(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 11508405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The right of people with disabilities to exercise their right to vote under the Help America Vote Act.
    Kanter A; Russo R
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2006; 30(6):852-7. PubMed ID: 17265747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inpatient rehabilitation at the crossroads.
    Morrison MH
    Rehab Manag; 2005 Jun; 18(5):53-4. PubMed ID: 15957499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disabled protest AHCA approach in lobbying for reform.
    Burns J
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Oct; 23(40):34-5. PubMed ID: 10171533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the courts have interpreted the related services mandate.
    Osborne AG
    Except Child; 1984 Nov; 51(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 6239783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.