411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9344350)
1. Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
Yoshiyama KK; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Oct; 38(11):2270-7. PubMed ID: 9344350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma.
Graham SL; Drance SM; Chauhan BC; Swindale NV; Hnik P; Mikelberg FS; Douglas GR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Dec; 37(13):2651-62. PubMed ID: 8977479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The selective effects of elevated intraocular pressure on temporal resolution.
Lachenmayr BJ; Drance SM
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992; 1(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 1477614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals.
Casson EJ; Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3096-102. PubMed ID: 8407217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hidden visual loss in optic neuropathy is revealed using Gabor patch contrast perimetry.
Bodis-Wollner I; Brannan JR
Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):284-91. PubMed ID: 9292257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Flicker perimetry (CFF) in glaucoma diagnosis].
Dudziński A; Zawojska I; Kinasz R
Klin Oczna; 2003; 105(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 14746180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diffuse and localized glaucomatous visual field changes in light sense, flicker and visual acuity perimetry. Evidence of pressure damage].
Lachenmayr BJ; Drance SM; Chauhan BC; House PH; Lalani S
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 1757044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
