BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9345348)

  • 1. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy.
    Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
    Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
    Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decision analysis of practice patterns used in evaluating and treating abnormal Pap smears.
    Roland PY; Naumann RW; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Partridge EE
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Oct; 59(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 7557619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear.
    Behtash N; Nazari Z; Fakhrejahani F; Khafaf A; Azar EG
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 17261100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
    Luesley D; Downey G
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
    Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.
    Twu NF; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Yu BK; Lai CR; Chao KC; Yuan CC; Yen MS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 16797826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.
    Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W
    Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost analysis of colposcopy for abnormal cytology in post-treatment surveillance for cervical cancer.
    Tergas AI; Havrilesky LJ; Fader AN; Guntupalli SR; Huh WK; Massad LS; Rimel BJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):421-5. PubMed ID: 23747836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does acetic acid influence the non-dysplastic Pap smear?
    Hornemann A; Husstedt WD; Hoellen F; Kamischke A; Diedrich K; Bohlmann MK
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1309-12. PubMed ID: 20552209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colposcopic evaluation after a repeat atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smear.
    Gerber S; De Grandi P; Petignat P; Mihaescu A; Delaloye JF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Dec; 75(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11728485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.
    Srisomboon J; Tangchaitrong CA; Bhusawang Y; Chairatana A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jul; 79(7):423-8. PubMed ID: 8855620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colposcopic and pathologic features in two cases of DES-related vaginal clear-cell adenocarcinoma.
    Blythe JG; Michael H; Hodel KA
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 6834354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.