These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9346456)
1. What is a screening test? Misclassification bias in observational studies of screening for cancer. Concato J J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 12(10):607-12. PubMed ID: 9346456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Schröder FH; van der Maas P; Beemsterboer P; Kruger AB; Hoedemaeker R; Rietbergen J; Kranse R J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1817-23. PubMed ID: 9839522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men. Agalliu I; Weiss NS; Lin DW; Stanford JL Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Nov; 18(9):931-7. PubMed ID: 17641982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A reliable coding system to define screening prostate-specific antigen tests was developed in a case-control study. Bunting PS; Neuman J; Goel V; Fleshner N; Kopec J; Levers P; Warde P J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 15878478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a population-based case-control study. Jacobsen SJ; Bergstralh EJ; Katusic SK; Guess HA; Darby CH; Silverstein MD; Oesterling JE; Lieber MM Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 9697778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer. Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misclassifying the indications for prostate-specific antigen testing may bias case-control studies of the efficacy of prostate cancer screening. Hoffman RM; Adams-Cameron ML; Murata GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 57(10):1071-5. PubMed ID: 15528058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval carcinomas in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)-Rotterdam. van der Cruijsen-Koeter IW; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(19):1462-6. PubMed ID: 14519752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case-control study. Richert-Boe KE; Humphrey LL; Glass AG; Weiss NS J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9718529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen]. Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Case-control prostate cancer screening studies should not exclude subjects with lower urinary tract symptoms. Godley PA; Carpenter WR J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 17208124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL. Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. Andriole GL; Levin DL; Crawford ED; Gelmann EP; Pinsky PF; Chia D; Kramer BS; Reding D; Church TR; Grubb RL; Izmirlian G; Ragard LR; Clapp JD; Prorok PC; Gohagan JK; J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 15770007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between literacy, compliance with prostate cancer screening, and cancer aggressiveness: results from a Brazilian screening study. Tobias-Machado M; Carvalhal GF; Freitas CH; Reis RB; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Magnabosco W; Vieira RA; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Faria EF; Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 23849582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Results of a retrospective evaluation of 1726 men. Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 7502414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening by prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in relation to prostate cancer mortality. A case-control study. Walsh PC J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 16217296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density. Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 7502415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of digital rectal examination on serum prostate-specific antigen in a primary care setting. The Internal Medicine Clinic Research Consortium. Arch Intern Med; 1995 Feb; 155(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 7531426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]