These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9347512)

  • 1. Influence of the addition of restorations on the diagnosis of caries from digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Sinton JM; Wood RE; Pharoah MJ; Lewis DW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 9347512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Prevalence of approximal enamel lesions on bitewing radiographs in cohorts, ages 14 to 23 years].
    Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kieft JA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Feb; 108(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 11383279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of digital grey-scale modification on the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions.
    Verdonschot EH; Kuijpers JM; Polder BJ; De Leng-Worm MH; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 1548386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restorative certainty and varying perceptions of dental caries depth among dentists.
    Lewis DW; Pharoah MJ; El-Mowafy O; Ross DG
    J Public Health Dent; 1997; 57(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 9558628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grey levels and radiolucent lesion depth as cavity predictors for approximal dentin caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Mariath AA; Casagrande L; de Araujo FB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):377-81. PubMed ID: 17881594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience.
    Lazarchik DA; Firestone AR; Heaven TJ; Filler SJ; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 8521436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentists' stated restorative treatment thresholds and their restorative and caries depth decisions.
    Lewis DW; Kay EJ; Main PA; Pharoah MG; Csima A
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 8906700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of dentine caries using the oblique lateral radiograph.
    Townsend D
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 10(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11310099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progression of posterior approximal carious lesions in Norwegian teenagers from 1982 to 1986.
    Lervik T; Haugejorden O; Aas C
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Aug; 48(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2220328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximal caries progression in 13- to 15-year-old Danish children.
    Bille J; Carstens K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Dec; 47(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 2692378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital radiographic measurement of approximal caries progression in fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Lawrence HP; Benn DK; Sheiham A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 25(6):412-8. PubMed ID: 9429813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approximal caries and frequency of bitewing examinations in Swedish children and adolescents.
    Gröndahl HG; Lith A; Jönsson G; Persson Y
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Feb; 20(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 1547607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
    Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Huumonen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Sipola A; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150129. PubMed ID: 26234536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 2. Evaluation of the size of approximal lesions and need for treatment.
    Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Kaffe I; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Eli I
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 8990681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic study of approximal restorative treatment in children and adolescents in two Swedish communities differing in caries prevalence.
    Lith A; Pettersson LG; Gröndahl HG
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 7587141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration of approximal carious lesions--application of decision analysis.
    Kay EJ; Brickley M; Knill-Jones R
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 23(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8529339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the likelihood of successful decisions to treat dentin caries from bitewing radiographs.
    Mileman PA; Mulder E; van der Weele L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 20(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1526099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.