These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9347753)

  • 1. Medical students' reasons for changing answers on multiple-choice tests.
    Harvill LM; Davis G
    Acad Med; 1997 Oct; 72(10 Suppl 1):S97-9. PubMed ID: 9347753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions.
    Rangel RH; Möller L; Sitter H; Stibane T; Strzelczyk A
    Med Teach; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28799435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt--and spread the word!
    Bauer D; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Aug; 7():28. PubMed ID: 17718902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.
    Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based decision about test scoring rules in clinical anatomy multiple-choice examinations.
    Severo M; Gaio AR; Povo A; Silva-Pereira F; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 25053378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Docimology of the national ranking exam in France: a need to better assess medical students’ reasoning].
    Quinton A; Rivière É
    Rev Prat; 2017 Sep; 67(7):716-718. PubMed ID: 30512762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Mixed-Methods Study of Prelicensure Nursing Students Changing Answers on Multiple Choice Examinations.
    George TP; Muller MA; Bartz JD
    J Nurs Educ; 2016 Apr; 55(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 27023892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item characteristics and answer-changing behaviors.
    Ballance CT
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Feb; 98(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 16673978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Graduating osteopathic medical students' perceptions and recommendations on the decision to take the USMLE.
    Lenchus JD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2012 Aug; 112(8):480-1; author reply 481-2. PubMed ID: 22904243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of answer changes by dental students on multiple choice tests in pathology: attack on an educational myth.
    Geller LM; Shemesh M
    J Dent Educ; 1979 Mar; 43(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 282321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inversions in true/false and in multiple choice questions -- a new form of item analysis.
    Koeslag JH; Melzer CW; Schach SR
    Med Educ; 1979 Nov; 13(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 537531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability and dimensionality of students' and supervisors' mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis.
    Berendonk C; Rogausch A; Gemperli A; Himmel W
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 29739387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acting on reflection: the effect of reflection on students' clinical performance on a standardized patient examination.
    Blatt B; Plack M; Maring J; Mintz M; Simmens SJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Jan; 22(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 17351839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?
    Rovick AA; Michael JA; Modell HI; Bruce DS; Horwitz B; Adamson T; Richardson DR; Silverthorn DU; Whitescarver SA
    Am J Physiol; 1999 Jun; 276(6 Pt 2):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16211673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Innovation in medical education: summer studentships.
    Cleland J; Engel N; Dunlop R; Kay C
    Clin Teach; 2010 Mar; 7(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21134143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre-clinical medical students.
    Humbert AJ; Johnson MT; Miech E; Friedberg F; Grackin JA; Seidman PA
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 21609176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The process of decision making by the student in the selection of answers to multiple choice questions].
    Gallofre A; Feytmans E; Swaneck J
    Rev Med Chil; 1973 Nov; 101(11):895-901. PubMed ID: 4787393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing narrative and multiple-choice formats in online communication skill assessment.
    Kim S; Spielberg F; Mauksch L; Farber S; Duong C; Fitch W; Greer T
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.