112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9347931)
1. The results of sensitisation testing of five metals in a mouse model.
Basketter D; Gerberick F
Toxicology; 1997 Nov; 123(1-2):161-4. PubMed ID: 9347931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the sensitization potential of five metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Mandervelt C; Clottens FL; Demedts M; Nemery B
Toxicology; 1997 Jun; 120(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9160110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction, refinement and replacement: putting the immune system to work.
Kimber I
Altern Lab Anim; 2002; 30(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 12511192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens.
Kimber I
Toxicology; 2001 Feb; 158(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11164993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive testing for respiratory sensitization in the mouse.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Dearman RJ
Toxicol Lett; 1996 Aug; 86(2-3):193-8. PubMed ID: 8711772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro and in vivo testing techniques for allergic contact dermatitis.
Gerberick GF; Sikorski EE
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 9601899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Cooper KJ; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lavender oil lacks natural protection against autoxidation, forming strong contact allergens on air exposure.
Hagvall L; Sköld M; Bråred-Christensson J; Börje A; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Sep; 59(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 18759894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of skin sensitization is augmented in Nrf2-deficient mice.
van der Veen JW; Gremmer ER; Vermeulen JP; van Loveren H; Ezendam J
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Apr; 87(4):763-6. PubMed ID: 23143620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and utilization of an ex vivo bromodeoxyuridine local lymph node assay protocol for assessing potential chemical sensitizers.
Williams WC; Copeland C; Boykin E; Quell SJ; Lehmann DM
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24532485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New tricks for an old assay.
Clay R
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Oct; 106(10):A488-9. PubMed ID: 9755150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shoe allergic contact dermatitis.
Matthys E; Zahir A; Ehrlich A
Dermatitis; 2014; 25(4):163-71. PubMed ID: 25000234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The murine local lymph node assay.
Hilton J; Kimber I
Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 43():227-35. PubMed ID: 7550652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The local lymph node assay compared with the human maximization test as an indicator of allergic potency in humans using patch test clinic populations.
Zaghi D; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2009; 28(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 19514928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
