These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9348125)

  • 21. Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea.
    Dynes SB; Delgutte B
    Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 58(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 1559909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Frequency selectivity of the normal guinea pig cochlea and in experimental hearing loss].
    Tavartkiladze GA; Kharrison RV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1985 Apr; 71(4):461-5. PubMed ID: 3996676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effect of intravenous injection of aspirin on the cochlea].
    Kumagai M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 1597302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aminoglycoside ototoxicity and the medial efferent system: II. Comparison of acute effects of different antibiotics.
    Lima da Costa D; Erre JP; Pehourq F; Aran JM
    Audiology; 1998; 37(3):162-73. PubMed ID: 9626861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ensemble spontaneous activity in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve.
    Searchfield GD; Muñoz DJ; Thorne PR
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 15157960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Middle latency responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in unanaesthetized guinea pigs.
    Popelár J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):69-74. PubMed ID: 8340279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modulation of thresholds to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the intact ear in guinea pig by furosemide and noise.
    Syka J; Popelár J
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 8071135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of xipamide and furosemide on guinea pig cochlear recorded potentials.
    Pose I; Monti JM; Velluti R
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 1983 Dec; 16(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 6673810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the monaurally deafened ferret to acoustic stimulation of the intact ear.
    McAlpine D; Martin RL; Mossop JE; Moore DR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Aug; 78(2):767-79. PubMed ID: 9307111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The efferent-mediated suppression of otoacoustic emissions in awake guinea pigs and its reversible blockage by gentamicin.
    Avan P; Erre JP; da Costa DL; Aran JM; Popelár J
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Apr; 109(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 8740203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Erre JP; Aran JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):616-27. PubMed ID: 6841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial overlap of combined electroacoustic stimulation determines the electrically evoked response in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Stronks HC; Prijs VF; Chimona TS; Grolman W; Klis SF
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1535-42. PubMed ID: 23099336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D; Gong Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise.
    Winslow RL; Sachs MB
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 57(4):1002-21. PubMed ID: 3585452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.