These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9348687)

  • 1. A probe-signal study of auditory discrimination of complex tones.
    Hill NI; Bailey PJ; Hodgson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2291-6. PubMed ID: 9348687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of spectral and periodicity cues in auditory stream segregation, measured using a temporal discrimination task.
    Vliegen J; Moore BC; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):938-45. PubMed ID: 10462799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Level discrimination of single tones in a multitone complex by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Doherty KA; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1831-40. PubMed ID: 10089606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral weights in profile listening.
    Berg BG; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):758-66. PubMed ID: 2212301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components.
    Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):949-61. PubMed ID: 8132909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues.
    Vliegen J; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):339-46. PubMed ID: 9921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of simple models of auditory profile analysis using random reference spectra.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Uchanski RM; Brantley MA; Shah P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1340-54. PubMed ID: 1939899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.
    Oh EL; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3489-99. PubMed ID: 9857508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of signals having expected and unexpected temporal structures.
    White LJ; Carlyon RP
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9367236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Macaque thresholds for detecting increases in intensity: effects of formant structure.
    Le Prell CG; Niemiec AJ; Moody DB
    Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 162(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observer weighting strategies in interaural time-difference discrimination and monaural level discrimination for a multi-tone complex.
    Dye RH; Stellmack MA; Jurcin NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3079-90. PubMed ID: 15957776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of frequency versus informational cues in uncertain frequency detection.
    Howard JH; O'Toole AJ; Rice SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):788-91. PubMed ID: 3958320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of changes in spectral shape: uniform vs. non-uniform background spectra.
    Bernstein LR; Green DM
    Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 3170358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different auditory filter bandwidth estimates based on profile analysis, notched noise, and hybrid tasks.
    Lentz JJ; Richards VM; Matiasek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2779-92. PubMed ID: 10573893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones.
    Singh PG; Hirsh IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2650-61. PubMed ID: 1479128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separate contributions of enhanced and suppressed sensitivity to the auditory attentional filter.
    Tan MN; Robertson D; Hammond GR
    Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):18-25. PubMed ID: 18524512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discriminability of narrow-band sounds in the absence of level cues.
    Kidd G; Uchanski RM; Mason CR; Deliwala PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):1028-37. PubMed ID: 8445114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral pattern and the perceptual fusion of harmonics. II. A special status for added components?
    Roberts B; Bailey PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3165-77. PubMed ID: 8300952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capture of attention in selective frequency listening.
    Green TJ; McKeown JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 11642703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of marker-related temporal cues on auditory gap-duration discrimination.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ; Sheft S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 23007205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.