BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9349511)

  • 1. Despite potential flaws, the false-negative proportion remains the best practical measure of the accuracy of cervical cytology screening.
    Krieger P; Naryshkin S
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 9349511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of error in calculating the false-negative rate in the interpretation of cervicovaginal smears: the need to review abnormal cases.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):264-71. PubMed ID: 9349512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
    Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitfalls in diagnostic cervicovaginal cytology.
    Sidawy MK; Solomon D
    Monogr Pathol; 1997; (39):1-15. PubMed ID: 9249817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
    Frable WJ
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control in cervical cytology.
    Husain OA; Butler EB; Evans DM; Macgregor JE; Yule R
    J Clin Pathol; 1974 Dec; 27(12):935-44. PubMed ID: 4141708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atypical or suspicious cervical smears. An aggressive diagnostic approach.
    Nyirjesy I
    JAMA; 1972 Nov; 222(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 4677898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How should adequacy of liquid-based cytology be defined?
    Desai M; Herbert A
    Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 16879262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the screening error rate from the observed detection rates in repeated cercival cytology.
    Coppleson LW; Brown B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Aug; 119(7):953-8. PubMed ID: 4841153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
    Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low proportion of false-negative smears in the Finnish program for cervical cancer screening.
    Lönnberg S; Anttila A; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Kujari H; Melkko J; Granroth G; Vornanen M; Pietiläinen T; Sankila A; Arola J; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Feb; 19(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 20142239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
    Homesley HD
    Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical smears in the study of intraepithelial neoplasms].
    Varleta L; Salas O; Toledo P; Iglesias J; Tisné L; Dabancens A; Lorenzetti L
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1978; 43(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 550214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of early cervical cancer by the irrigation smear technic.
    Srivannaboon S; Srivannaboon S; Phijaisanit P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1982 Jul; 65(7):361-5. PubMed ID: 7142859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
    Wagner D; Noltenius HW
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter: Screening for cervical cancer.
    Lancet; 1974 Jun; 1(7868):1221. PubMed ID: 4134347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.